[U-Boot] [U-Boot, 2/7] IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus
Excuse the noob question. Is it intentional to replace '(dev >> 1) with '(dev >> 0)' ?
On 03/30/2011 07:27 PM, Gray Remlin wrote:
Excuse the noob question. Is it intentional to replace '(dev >> 1) with '(dev >> 0)' ?
Ignore me, I get it. Divide by two, or not, as required.
On 2011/03/30 8:49 PM, Gray Remlin wrote:
On 03/30/2011 07:27 PM, Gray Remlin wrote:
Excuse the noob question. Is it intentional to replace '(dev >> 1) with '(dev >> 0)' ?
Ignore me, I get it. Divide by two, or not, as required.
Hi Gray,
Please also see the thread that starts at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg36411.html
Albert was investigating changes to the IDE code to support multiple busses for his LaCie Net5big (with 8 ports). Not sure if he ever got it merged.
Rogan
Le 30/03/2011 21:45, Rogan Dawes a écrit :
On 2011/03/30 8:49 PM, Gray Remlin wrote:
On 03/30/2011 07:27 PM, Gray Remlin wrote:
Excuse the noob question. Is it intentional to replace '(dev>> 1) with '(dev>> 0)' ?
Ignore me, I get it. Divide by two, or not, as required.
Hi Gray,
Please also see the thread that starts at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg36411.html
Albert was investigating changes to the IDE code to support multiple busses for his LaCie Net5big (with 8 ports). Not sure if he ever got it merged.
Not yet but I will resume this once 2011.03 is out.
Rogan
Amicalement,
participants (3)
-
Albert ARIBAUD -
Gray Remlin -
Rogan Dawes