Some 86xx chips use CCB as the base clock for the I2C, and others used CCB/2. There is no pattern that can be used to determine which chips use which frequency, so the only way to determine is to look up the actual SOC designation and use the right value for that SOC.

Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi timur@freescale.com ---

Yes, this is ugly and stupid, but the only alternative is to update each board configuration file with another CONFIG_ option. And yes, this does mean that as new 86xx variants are announced, cpu/mpc86xx/speed.c may need to be updated.

cpu/mpc86xx/speed.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cpu/mpc86xx/speed.c b/cpu/mpc86xx/speed.c index 7e884f8..da5b58b 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc86xx/speed.c +++ b/cpu/mpc86xx/speed.c @@ -105,8 +105,20 @@ int get_clocks(void) get_sys_info(&sys_info); gd->cpu_clk = sys_info.freqProcessor; gd->bus_clk = sys_info.freqSystemBus; + + /* + * The base clock for I2C depends on the actual SOC. Unfortunately, + * there is no pattern that can be used to determine the frequency, so + * the only choice is to look up the actual SOC number and use the value + * for that SOC. This information is taken from application note + * AN2919. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_MPC8610 gd->i2c1_clk = sys_info.freqSystemBus; - gd->i2c2_clk = sys_info.freqSystemBus; +#else + gd->i2c1_clk = sys_info.freqSystemBus / 2; +#endif + gd->i2c2_clk = gd->i2c1_clk;

if (gd->cpu_clk != 0) return 0;