[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm/s5pxx: Fix get_timer_masked to get the time.

From: Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com
In general, The get_timer_masked function get the system time, no the number of ticks. Such as the nand_wait_ready will use get_timer_masked to delay the operations. And change the system time to adopt to the CONFIG_SYS_HZ.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhong bocui107@gmail.com --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c | 2 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c index 58d279e..44d7bc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int pwm_init(int pwm_id, int div, int invert) timer_rate_hz = get_pwm_clk() / ((prescaler + 1) * (div + 1));
- timer_rate_hz = timer_rate_hz / 100; + timer_rate_hz = timer_rate_hz / CONFIG_SYS_HZ;
/* set count value */ offset = pwm_id * 3; diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c index 359c21f..bb0e795 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
+unsigned long get_current_tick(void); + /* macro to read the 16 bit timer */ static inline struct s5p_timer *s5p_get_base_timer(void) { @@ -44,6 +46,8 @@ int timer_init(void) pwm_config(4, 0, 0); pwm_enable(4);
+ reset_timer_masked(); + return 0; }
@@ -72,16 +76,16 @@ void __udelay(unsigned long usec) * 3. finish normalize. */ tmo = usec / 1000; - tmo *= (CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value / 10); + tmo *= (CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value); tmo /= 1000; } else { /* else small number, don't kill it prior to HZ multiply */ - tmo = usec * CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value / 10; + tmo = usec * CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value; tmo /= (1000 * 1000); }
/* get current timestamp */ - tmp = get_timer(0); + tmp = get_current_tick();
/* if setting this fordward will roll time stamp */ /* reset "advancing" timestamp to 0, set lastinc value */ @@ -92,7 +96,7 @@ void __udelay(unsigned long usec) tmo += tmp;
/* loop till event */ - while (get_timer_masked() < tmo) + while (get_current_tick() < tmo) ; /* nop */ }
@@ -108,6 +112,14 @@ void reset_timer_masked(void) unsigned long get_timer_masked(void) { struct s5p_timer *const timer = s5p_get_base_timer(); + unsigned long count_value = readl(&timer->tcntb4); + + return get_current_tick() / count_value; +} + +unsigned long get_current_tick(void) +{ + struct s5p_timer *const timer = s5p_get_base_timer(); unsigned long now = readl(&timer->tcnto4); unsigned long count_value = readl(&timer->tcntb4);

Hi Minkyu,
Could you help me to review it?
Thanks, hongbo
On 07/03/2012 07:50 AM, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com
In general, The get_timer_masked function get the system time, no the number of ticks. Such as the nand_wait_ready will use get_timer_masked to delay the operations. And change the system time to adopt to the CONFIG_SYS_HZ.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhong bocui107@gmail.com
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c | 2 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c index 58d279e..44d7bc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int pwm_init(int pwm_id, int div, int invert) timer_rate_hz = get_pwm_clk() / ((prescaler + 1) * (div + 1));
- timer_rate_hz = timer_rate_hz / 100;
timer_rate_hz = timer_rate_hz / CONFIG_SYS_HZ;
/* set count value */ offset = pwm_id * 3;
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c index 359c21f..bb0e795 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
+unsigned long get_current_tick(void);
/* macro to read the 16 bit timer */ static inline struct s5p_timer *s5p_get_base_timer(void) { @@ -44,6 +46,8 @@ int timer_init(void) pwm_config(4, 0, 0); pwm_enable(4);
- reset_timer_masked();
- return 0;
}
@@ -72,16 +76,16 @@ void __udelay(unsigned long usec) * 3. finish normalize. */ tmo = usec / 1000;
tmo *= (CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value / 10);
tmo /= 1000; } else { /* else small number, don't kill it prior to HZ multiply */tmo *= (CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value);
tmo = usec * CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value / 10;
tmo = usec * CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value;
tmo /= (1000 * 1000); }
/* get current timestamp */
- tmp = get_timer(0);
tmp = get_current_tick();
/* if setting this fordward will roll time stamp */ /* reset "advancing" timestamp to 0, set lastinc value */
@@ -92,7 +96,7 @@ void __udelay(unsigned long usec) tmo += tmp;
/* loop till event */
- while (get_timer_masked() < tmo)
- while (get_current_tick() < tmo) ; /* nop */
}
@@ -108,6 +112,14 @@ void reset_timer_masked(void) unsigned long get_timer_masked(void) { struct s5p_timer *const timer = s5p_get_base_timer();
- unsigned long count_value = readl(&timer->tcntb4);
- return get_current_tick() / count_value;
+}
+unsigned long get_current_tick(void) +{
- struct s5p_timer *const timer = s5p_get_base_timer(); unsigned long now = readl(&timer->tcnto4); unsigned long count_value = readl(&timer->tcntb4);

Dear Jaehoon and Donghwa,
On 5 July 2012 20:55, Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
Could you help me to review it?
Thanks, hongbo
On 07/03/2012 07:50 AM, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com
In general, The get_timer_masked function get the system time, no the number of ticks. Such as the nand_wait_ready will use get_timer_masked to delay the operations. And change the system time to adopt to the CONFIG_SYS_HZ.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhong bocui107@gmail.com
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c | 2 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Could please test this patch.
Thanks. Minkyu Kang.

Hi Minkyu,
I tested on trats-board. I think it's working fine.
Tested-by: Jaehoon Chungjh80.chung@samsung.com
Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung
On 07/06/2012 11:13 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear Jaehoon and Donghwa,
On 5 July 2012 20:55, Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
Could you help me to review it?
Thanks, hongbo
On 07/03/2012 07:50 AM, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com
In general, The get_timer_masked function get the system time, no the number of ticks. Such as the nand_wait_ready will use get_timer_masked to delay the operations. And change the system time to adopt to the CONFIG_SYS_HZ.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhong bocui107@gmail.com
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c | 2 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Could please test this patch.
Thanks. Minkyu Kang.

On 6 July 2012 13:43, Jaehoon Chung jh80.chung@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
I tested on trats-board. I think it's working fine.
Tested-by: Jaehoon Chungjh80.chung@samsung.com
Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung
On 07/06/2012 11:13 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear Jaehoon and Donghwa,
On 5 July 2012 20:55, Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
Could you help me to review it?
Thanks, hongbo
On 07/03/2012 07:50 AM, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com
In general, The get_timer_masked function get the system time, no the number of ticks. Such as the nand_wait_ready will use get_timer_masked to delay the operations. And change the system time to adopt to the CONFIG_SYS_HZ.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhong bocui107@gmail.com
applied to u-boot-samsung.
Thanks. Minkyu Kang.

On 07/06/2012 07:20 PM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
On 6 July 2012 13:43, Jaehoon Chung jh80.chung@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
I tested on trats-board. I think it's working fine.
Tested-by: Jaehoon Chungjh80.chung@samsung.com
Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung
On 07/06/2012 11:13 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear Jaehoon and Donghwa,
On 5 July 2012 20:55, Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
Could you help me to review it?
Thanks, hongbo
On 07/03/2012 07:50 AM, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui107@gmail.com
In general, The get_timer_masked function get the system time, no the number of ticks. Such as the nand_wait_ready will use get_timer_masked to delay the operations. And change the system time to adopt to the CONFIG_SYS_HZ.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhong bocui107@gmail.com
applied to u-boot-samsung.
Hi Jaehoon and Minkyu,
Thanks!
BR, hongbo
Thanks. Minkyu Kang.
participants (3)
-
Jaehoon Chung
-
Minkyu Kang
-
Zhong Hongbo