Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot compilation
Andre,
Please include the list in your replies.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:40:03PM +0100, André Stierenberg wrote:
i have used the toolchain 2.95.3 from www.arm.linux.org.uk. I have installed in in /usr/local/arm like discribed in the README file..
My impression when I looked at this toolchain for the last time was that it is only a stage 1 toolchain - at least this is what the build script generates.
then i did a make lubbock_config and make all i n the u-boot direkctory. At some point there comes a errer message that the file mach-types.h is missing what is needed by hardware.h in the toolchain.
Could you cut-and-paste the error message plus some context? It's a little bit difficult to find out what happens if you don't give us more information.
Robert
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:40:03PM +0100, André Stierenberg wrote:
i have used the toolchain 2.95.3 from www.arm.linux.org.uk. I have installed in in /usr/local/arm like discribed in the README file..
My impression when I looked at this toolchain for the last time was that it is only a stage 1 toolchain - at least this is what the build script generates.
Not sure what you've meant, but I'm using the 2.95.3 from www.arm.linux.org.uk to compile armboot, now with my u-boot tries. I used it with Linux up to 2.4.17, now I'm using 3.2 (from the same location). It does NOT work with redboot.
One thing that one has to do with this 2.95.3 right is the installation location. It has to be /usr/local/arm/2.95.3 so that your PATH is /usr/local/arm/2.95.3/bin:$PATH
participants (2)
-
Holger Schurig -
Robert Schwebel