[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: bcm2835: add missing mbox overscan response field

Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan.
Signed-off-by: Andre Heider a.heider@gmail.com --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h index 24abe57..6b806ec 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan { u32 top; u32 bottom; u32 left; + u32 right; } resp; } body; };

On 10/22/2013 09:27 PM, Andre Heider wrote:
Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan.
This one patch, Acked-by: Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org
You need to send/cc this patch to Albert Aribauld, since he applies ARM patches. Or, perhaps just make sure the patch gets assigned to him in patchwork?

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/22/2013 09:27 PM, Andre Heider wrote:
Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan.
This one patch, Acked-by: Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org
You need to send/cc this patch to Albert Aribauld, since he applies ARM patches. Or, perhaps just make sure the patch gets assigned to him in patchwork?
Okay, I did the patchwork dance :)
Thanks, Andre

Hi Andre,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:46:31 +0200, Andre Heider a.heider@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/22/2013 09:27 PM, Andre Heider wrote:
Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan.
This one patch, Acked-by: Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org
You need to send/cc this patch to Albert Aribauld, since he applies ARM patches. Or, perhaps just make sure the patch gets assigned to him in patchwork?
Okay, I did the patchwork dance :)
Thanks, Andre
In fact, the series could be applied as a whole by the same custodian -- and actually, I'd prefer it to be applied as a whole, since patch 1/2 alone looks like dead/useless code, whereas it makes sense if applied along with 2/2.
Amicalement,

On 11/07/2013 06:29 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Andre,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:46:31 +0200, Andre Heider a.heider@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/22/2013 09:27 PM, Andre Heider wrote:
Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan.
This one patch, Acked-by: Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org
You need to send/cc this patch to Albert Aribauld, since he applies ARM patches. Or, perhaps just make sure the patch gets assigned to him in patchwork?
Okay, I did the patchwork dance :)
Thanks, Andre
In fact, the series could be applied as a whole by the same custodian -- and actually, I'd prefer it to be applied as a whole, since patch 1/2 alone looks like dead/useless code, whereas it makes sense if applied along with 2/2.
So, there are 2 patches and 2 custodians. One of you has to ack the patch for the other to merge them both through the other's subsystem, right? I guess you want Anatolij to take both of these through the video tree based on your comments. If so, can you ack this patch and re-assign them both in patchwork, so he knows that?

Hi Stephen,
On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:30:54 -0700, Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
So, there are 2 patches and 2 custodians. One of you has to ack the patch for the other to merge them both through the other's subsystem, right? I guess you want Anatolij to take both of these through the video tree based on your comments. If so, can you ack this patch and re-assign them both in patchwork, so he knows that?
Done (although I suspect that in this instance, my Ack was not really needed, as the change was quite trivial and did not require any ARM- specific knowledge).
Amicalement,

Hi Andre,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:27:20 +0200, Andre Heider a.heider@gmail.com wrote:
Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan.
Signed-off-by: Andre Heider a.heider@gmail.com
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h index 24abe57..6b806ec 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan { u32 top; u32 bottom; u32 left;
} resp; } body;u32 right;
};
Acked-by: Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net
Amicalement,

On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:27:20 +0200 Andre Heider a.heider@gmail.com wrote:
Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan.
Signed-off-by: Andre Heider a.heider@gmail.com
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
applied to u-boot-video/master, thanks!
Anatolij
participants (4)
-
Albert ARIBAUD
-
Anatolij Gustschin
-
Andre Heider
-
Stephen Warren