[U-Boot] [PATCH-OMAP3] OMAP3: Update ARM's if then else logic in examples Makefile
Update ARM's if then else logic.
--- examples/Makefile | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: u-boot-arm/examples/Makefile =================================================================== --- u-boot-arm.orig/examples/Makefile +++ u-boot-arm/examples/Makefile @@ -30,12 +30,12 @@ LOAD_ADDR = 0x40000 endif
ifeq ($(ARCH),arm) -LOAD_ADDR = 0xc100000 ifeq ($(BOARD),omap2420h4) LOAD_ADDR = 0x80300000 -endif -ifeq ($(CPU),omap3) +else ifeq ($(CPU),omap3) LOAD_ADDR = 0x80300000 +else +LOAD_ADDR = 0xc100000 endif endif
Dear dirk.behme@googlemail.com,
In message 4919a022.1f205e0a.2f5b.ffffc570@mx.google.com you wrote:
Update ARM's if then else logic.
examples/Makefile | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hm... wouldn't it make sense to explicitely state against which repository this patch (and all other of your patches) was (were) made resp. where you want to have it added? For mainline, it just wouldn't work (as you probably know).
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear dirk.behme@googlemail.com,
In message 4919a022.1f205e0a.2f5b.ffffc570@mx.google.com you wrote:
Update ARM's if then else logic.
examples/Makefile | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hm... wouldn't it make sense to explicitely state against which repository this patch (and all other of your patches) was (were) made resp. where you want to have it added?
Hm, I think this info is already there? Have you noticed the "[PATCH-OMAP3] OMAP3" in subject? Having this identifier in subject is the way Jean-Christophe likes to have patches for u-boot-arm/omap3 [1] [2] marked.
Regarding my pending patches, there is one exception and this is
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-November/043220.html
This is for (u-boot-arm) mainline as expressed by "ARM" in subject. As mentioned in note of this patch, I did it against mainline cause u-boot-arm wasn't in sync with mainline while creating that patch. But as u-boot-arm is in sync with mainline again now, it should apply there, too.
Best regards
Dirk
[1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-November/042897.html
[2] http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/omap3
participants (4)
-
Dirk Behme -
dirk.behmeï¼ googlemail.com
-
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD -
Wolfgang Denk