[U-Boot] "b reset" does not work in u-boot_v2010.12-rc3 with eldk4.2

Hi,when i upgrade uboot from 1.1.2 to v2010.12-rc3 i met a great number of problems. Before, i use skyeye to simulate uboot. furthermore i use "arm-linux-gdb u-boot"(eldk-4.2) to step by step executes u-boot the result like below:
(gdb) tar remote :12345 Remote debugging using :12345 _start () at start.S:40 40 start.S: No such file or directory. in start.S Current language: auto; currently asm (gdb) (gdb) step _start () at start.S:41 41 in start.S (gdb) _start () at start.S:42 42 in start.S (gdb) _start () at start.S:43 43 in start.S (gdb) _start () at start.S:44 44 in start.S (gdb) _start () at start.S:45 45 in start.S (gdb) _start () at start.S:46 46 in start.S (gdb) _start () at start.S:47 47 in start.S (gdb) reset () at start.S:108 108 in start.S (gdb) reset () at start.S:109 109 in start.S (gdb) reset () at start.S:110 110 in start.S (gdb) reset () at start.S:111 111 in start.S (gdb) reset () at start.S:118 118 in start.S (gdb) reset () at start.S:124 124 in start.S (gdb) call_board_init_f () at start.S:129 129 in start.S (gdb) call_board_init_f () at start.S:130 130 in start.S (gdb) call_board_init_f () at start.S:131 131 in start.S (gdb) call_board_init_f () at start.S:132 132 in start.S (gdb)
These indicate that in start.S,first instruction:b reset not jump success The process just go from one instruction to the next. What may be the problem?any suggestions is appreciate. MrGates

Dear "MrGates",
In message 89E1F23FA74D47E7B01BE455B231E303@MrGates you wrote:
(gdb) step _start () at start.S:41 41 in start.S
...
_start () at start.S:47 47 in start.S (gdb) reset () at start.S:108 108 in start.S
...
reset () at start.S:124 124 in start.S (gdb) call_board_init_f () at start.S:129 129 in start.S
...
These indicate that in start.S,first instruction:b reset not jump success
What do you mean by that statement?
The process just go from one instruction to the next.
You are running series of "step" commands - you are asking the debugger to "go from one instruction to the next", and this is what it does. What else would you expect?
What may be the problem?any suggestions is appreciate.
Where exactly do you see a problem?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
participants (2)
-
MrGates
-
Wolfgang Denk