[U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl_law: Fix LAW printing function

We had an extra '0x' in the output of the LAWAR header that would cause output like:
LAWBAR11: 0x00000000 LAWAR0x11: 0x80f0001d
intead of:
LAWBAR11: 0x00000000 LAWAR11: 0x80f0001d
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org --- drivers/misc/fsl_law.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/fsl_law.c b/drivers/misc/fsl_law.c index 63c08bf..031c974 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/fsl_law.c +++ b/drivers/misc/fsl_law.c @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ void print_laws(void) #else printf("LAWBAR%02d: 0x%08x", i, in_be32(LAWBAR_ADDR(i))); #endif - printf(" LAWAR0x%02d: 0x%08x\n", i, lawar); + printf(" LAWAR%02d: 0x%08x\n", i, lawar); printf("\t(EN: %d TGT: 0x%02x SIZE: ", (lawar & LAW_EN) ? 1 : 0, (lawar >> 20) & 0xff); print_size(lawar_size(lawar), ")\n");

On Feb 13, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
We had an extra '0x' in the output of the LAWAR header that would cause output like:
LAWBAR11: 0x00000000 LAWAR0x11: 0x80f0001d
intead of:
LAWBAR11: 0x00000000 LAWAR11: 0x80f0001d
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
drivers/misc/fsl_law.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
applied
- k
participants (1)
-
Kumar Gala