[PATCH v5 0/2] gpio: Add a managed API

Hi,
This is a re-submission of Jean-Jacques' earlier work in October last year. It can be found at [0]. The goal is to facilitate porting drivers from the Linux kernel. Most of the series will be about adding managed APIs to existing infrastructure (GPIO, reset, regmap).
This particular series is about GPIOs. It adds a managed API using the API as Linux. To make it 100% compatible with linux, there is a small deviation from u-boot's way of naming the gpio lists: the managed equivalent of gpio_request_by_name(..,"blabla-gpios", ...) is devm_gpiod_get_index(..., "blabla", ...)
Changes in v5: In individual patches.
Changes in v4: - Rebase on latest master and fix merge conflicts. - Move "another-test" node down the order to make sure dm_test_fdt_uclass_seq() continues to work. - Bump num_devices to 9 in dm_test_bus_children(), dm_test_fdt(), and dm_test_uclass_foreach() to fix broken tests. - s/DM_TESTF/UT_TESTF/g
Changes in v3: - Add a blank line before return in devm_gpiod_get_index(). - Add Simon's Reviwed-by in both patches.
Changes in v2: - The original series had a patch that checked for NULL pointers in the core GPIO functions. The checks were needed because of the addition of devm_gpiod_get_index_optional() which would return NULL when when no GPIO was assigned to the requested function. This is convenient for drivers that need to handle optional GPIOs.
Simon argued that those should be behind a Kconfig option because of code size concerns. He also argued against implicit return in the macro that checked for the optional GPIOs.
This submission removes the controversial patch so that base functionality can get merged.
We still need to take a stance on who is responsible for the NULL check: the driver or the GPIO core? Do we want to trust drivers to take care of the NULL checks, or do we want to distrust them and make sure they don't send us anything bogus in the GPIO core. I will send a separate RFC of the NULL check patch and we can probably discuss the issue there.
[0] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20191001115130.18886-1-jjhi...
Jean-Jacques Hiblot (2): drivers: gpio: Add a managed API to get a GPIO from the device-tree test: gpio: Add tests for the managed API
arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts | 10 ++++ drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/asm-generic/gpio.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++ test/dm/bus.c | 2 +- test/dm/gpio.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ test/dm/test-fdt.c | 6 +-- 6 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
-- 2.28.0

From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com
Add managed functions to get a gpio from the devce-tree, based on a property name (minus the '-gpios' suffix) and optionally an index.
When the device is unbound, the GPIO is automatically released and the data structure is freed.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav p.yadav@ti.com ---
Notes: Heinrich,
I tried adding API documentation for GPIO but sphinx throws a lot of warnings and errors, some of which are not trivial to fix. I will send those changes as a separate series. Since it will just pull the documentation from the kernel-doc comments, which we already have for all the new and old functions, this series should be treated independent of the API documentation series.
Changes in v5:
- s/driver detach/device unbind/ in devm_gpiod_get_index() documentation.
drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/asm-generic/gpio.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c index 9c53299b6a..0c01413b58 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ #include <common.h> #include <dm.h> #include <log.h> +#include <dm/devres.h> +#include <dm/device_compat.h> #include <dm/device-internal.h> #include <dm/lists.h> #include <dm/uclass-internal.h> @@ -1209,6 +1211,75 @@ int gpio_dev_request_index(struct udevice *dev, const char *nodename, flags, 0, dev); }
+static void devm_gpiod_release(struct udevice *dev, void *res) +{ + dm_gpio_free(dev, res); +} + +static int devm_gpiod_match(struct udevice *dev, void *res, void *data) +{ + return res == data; +} + +struct gpio_desc *devm_gpiod_get_index(struct udevice *dev, const char *id, + unsigned int index, int flags) +{ + int rc; + struct gpio_desc *desc; + char *propname; + static const char suffix[] = "-gpios"; + + propname = malloc(strlen(id) + sizeof(suffix)); + if (!propname) { + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto end; + } + + strcpy(propname, id); + strcat(propname, suffix); + + desc = devres_alloc(devm_gpiod_release, sizeof(struct gpio_desc), + __GFP_ZERO); + if (unlikely(!desc)) { + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto end; + } + + rc = gpio_request_by_name(dev, propname, index, desc, flags); + +end: + if (propname) + free(propname); + + if (rc) + return ERR_PTR(rc); + + devres_add(dev, desc); + + return desc; +} + +struct gpio_desc *devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(struct udevice *dev, + const char *id, + unsigned int index, + int flags) +{ + struct gpio_desc *desc = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, id, index, flags); + + if (IS_ERR(desc)) + return NULL; + + return desc; +} + +void devm_gpiod_put(struct udevice *dev, struct gpio_desc *desc) +{ + int rc; + + rc = devres_release(dev, devm_gpiod_release, devm_gpiod_match, desc); + WARN_ON(rc); +} + static int gpio_post_bind(struct udevice *dev) { struct udevice *child; diff --git a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h index a57dd2665c..3ae1894a98 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h @@ -701,4 +701,51 @@ int gpio_get_number(const struct gpio_desc *desc); */ int gpio_get_acpi(const struct gpio_desc *desc, struct acpi_gpio *gpio);
+/** + * devm_gpiod_get_index - Resource-managed gpiod_get() + * @dev: GPIO consumer + * @con_id: function within the GPIO consumer + * @index: index of the GPIO to obtain in the consumer + * @flags: optional GPIO initialization flags + * + * Managed gpiod_get(). GPIO descriptors returned from this function are + * automatically disposed on device unbind. + * Return the GPIO descriptor corresponding to the function con_id of device + * dev, -ENOENT if no GPIO has been assigned to the requested function, or + * another IS_ERR() code if an error occurred while trying to acquire the GPIO. + */ +struct gpio_desc *devm_gpiod_get_index(struct udevice *dev, const char *id, + unsigned int index, int flags); + +#define devm_gpiod_get(dev, id, flags) devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, id, 0, flags) +/** + * gpiod_get_optional - obtain an optional GPIO for a given GPIO function + * @dev: GPIO consumer, can be NULL for system-global GPIOs + * @con_id: function within the GPIO consumer + * @index: index of the GPIO to obtain in the consumer + * @flags: optional GPIO initialization flags + * + * This is equivalent to devm_gpiod_get(), except that when no GPIO was + * assigned to the requested function it will return NULL. This is convenient + * for drivers that need to handle optional GPIOs. + */ +struct gpio_desc *devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(struct udevice *dev, + const char *id, + unsigned int index, + int flags); + +#define devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, id, flags) \ + devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, id, 0, flags) + +/** + * devm_gpiod_put - Resource-managed gpiod_put() + * @dev: GPIO consumer + * @desc: GPIO descriptor to dispose of + * + * Dispose of a GPIO descriptor obtained with devm_gpiod_get() or + * devm_gpiod_get_index(). Normally this function will not be called as the GPIO + * will be disposed of by the resource management code. + */ +void devm_gpiod_put(struct udevice *dev, struct gpio_desc *desc); + #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_GPIO_H_ */

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:43:34PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com
Add managed functions to get a gpio from the devce-tree, based on a property name (minus the '-gpios' suffix) and optionally an index.
When the device is unbound, the GPIO is automatically released and the data structure is freed.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav p.yadav@ti.com
Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!

From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com
Add a test to verify that GPIOs can be acquired/released using the managed API. Also check that the GPIOs are released when the consumer device is removed.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav p.yadav@ti.com ---
Notes: Changes in v5:
- Add Simon's Reviewed-by.
Changes in v4:
- Fix merge conflicts.
- Move "another-test" node down the order to make sure dm_test_fdt_uclass_seq() continues to work.
- Bump num_devices to 9 in dm_test_bus_children(), dm_test_fdt(), and dm_test_uclass_foreach() to fix broken tests. - s/DM_TESTF/UT_TESTF/g
arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts | 10 ++++ test/dm/bus.c | 2 +- test/dm/gpio.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ test/dm/test-fdt.c | 6 +-- 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts b/arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts index 9f45c48e4e..d35aa6d1f5 100644 --- a/arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts +++ b/arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts @@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ <&gpio_c 5 GPIO_IN>, <&gpio_c 6 (GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW|GPIO_OUT|GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>, <&gpio_c 7 (GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW|GPIO_OUT|GPIO_OPEN_SOURCE)>; + test4-gpios = <&gpio_a 14>, <&gpio_b 4 1 3 2 1>; + test5-gpios = <&gpio_a 19>; + int-value = <1234>; uint-value = <(-1234)>; int64-value = /bits/ 64 <0x1111222233334444>; @@ -270,6 +273,13 @@ compatible = "denx,u-boot-devres-test"; };
+ another-test { + reg = <0 2>; + compatible = "denx,u-boot-fdt-test"; + test4-gpios = <&gpio_a 14>, <&gpio_b 4 1 3 2 1>; + test5-gpios = <&gpio_a 19>; + }; + acpi_test1: acpi-test { compatible = "denx,u-boot-acpi-test"; acpi-ssdt-test-data = "ab"; diff --git a/test/dm/bus.c b/test/dm/bus.c index 865e8bd9fb..27b7266645 100644 --- a/test/dm/bus.c +++ b/test/dm/bus.c @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ UCLASS_DRIVER(testbus) = { /* Test that we can probe for children */ static int dm_test_bus_children(struct unit_test_state *uts) { - int num_devices = 8; + int num_devices = 9; struct udevice *bus; struct uclass *uc;
diff --git a/test/dm/gpio.c b/test/dm/gpio.c index 4848152644..54e960b185 100644 --- a/test/dm/gpio.c +++ b/test/dm/gpio.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <malloc.h> #include <acpi/acpi_device.h> #include <asm/gpio.h> +#include <dm/device-internal.h> #include <dm/root.h> #include <dm/test.h> #include <dm/util.h> @@ -480,3 +481,104 @@ static int dm_test_gpio_get_acpi_irq(struct unit_test_state *uts) return 0; } DM_TEST(dm_test_gpio_get_acpi_irq, UT_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | UT_TESTF_SCAN_FDT); + +/* Test that we can get/release GPIOs using managed API */ +static int dm_test_gpio_devm(struct unit_test_state *uts) +{ + static const u32 flags = GPIOD_IS_OUT | GPIOD_IS_OUT_ACTIVE; + struct gpio_desc *desc1, *desc2, *desc3, *desc_err; + struct udevice *dev; + struct udevice *dev2; + + ut_assertok(uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_TEST_FDT, "a-test", + &dev)); + ut_assertok(uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_TEST_FDT, "another-test", + &dev2)); + + /* Get 3 GPIOs from 'a-test' dev */ + desc1 = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "test4", 0, flags); + ut_assert(!IS_ERR(desc1)); + desc2 = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "test4", 1, flags); + ut_assert(!IS_ERR(desc2)); + desc3 = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "test5", 0, flags); + ut_assert(!IS_ERR(desc3)); + ut_assert(desc3); + + /* + * Try get the same 3 GPIOs from 'a-test' and 'another-test' devices. + * check that it fails + */ + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "test4", 0, flags); + ut_asserteq(-EBUSY, PTR_ERR(desc_err)); + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev2, "test4", 0, flags); + ut_asserteq(-EBUSY, PTR_ERR(desc_err)); + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "test4", 1, flags); + ut_asserteq(-EBUSY, PTR_ERR(desc_err)); + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev2, "test4", 1, flags); + ut_asserteq(-EBUSY, PTR_ERR(desc_err)); + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "test5", 0, flags); + ut_asserteq_ptr(NULL, desc_err); + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev2, "test5", 0, flags); + ut_asserteq_ptr(NULL, desc_err); + + /* Try get GPIOs outside of the list */ + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "test4", 2, flags); + ut_assert(IS_ERR(desc_err)); + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "test5", 1, flags); + ut_asserteq_ptr(NULL, desc_err); + + /* Manipulate the GPIOs */ + ut_assertok(dm_gpio_set_value(desc1, 1)); + ut_asserteq(1, dm_gpio_get_value(desc1)); + ut_assertok(dm_gpio_set_value(desc1, 0)); + ut_asserteq(0, dm_gpio_get_value(desc1)); + + ut_assertok(dm_gpio_set_value(desc2, 1)); + ut_asserteq(1, dm_gpio_get_value(desc2)); + ut_assertok(dm_gpio_set_value(desc2, 0)); + ut_asserteq(0, dm_gpio_get_value(desc2)); + + ut_assertok(dm_gpio_set_value(desc3, 1)); + ut_asserteq(1, dm_gpio_get_value(desc3)); + ut_assertok(dm_gpio_set_value(desc3, 0)); + ut_asserteq(0, dm_gpio_get_value(desc3)); + + /* Check that the GPIO cannot be owned by more than one device */ + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev2, "test4", 0, flags); + ut_asserteq(-EBUSY, PTR_ERR(desc_err)); + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev2, "test4", 1, flags); + ut_asserteq(-EBUSY, PTR_ERR(desc_err)); + desc_err = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev2, "test5", 0, flags); + ut_asserteq_ptr(NULL, desc_err); + + /* + * Release one GPIO and check that we can get it back using + * 'another-test' and then 'a-test' + */ + devm_gpiod_put(dev, desc2); + desc2 = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev2, "test4", 1, flags); + ut_assert(!IS_ERR(desc2)); + + devm_gpiod_put(dev2, desc2); + desc2 = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "test4", 1, flags); + ut_assert(!IS_ERR(desc2)); + + /* Release one GPIO before removing the 'a-test' dev. */ + devm_gpiod_put(dev, desc2); + device_remove(dev, DM_REMOVE_NORMAL); + + /* All the GPIOs must have been freed. We should be able to claim + * them with the 'another-test' device. + */ + desc1 = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev2, "test4", 0, flags); + ut_assert(!IS_ERR(desc1)); + desc2 = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev2, "test4", 1, flags); + ut_assert(!IS_ERR(desc2)); + desc3 = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev2, "test5", 0, flags); + ut_assert(!IS_ERR(desc3)); + ut_assert(desc3); + + device_remove(dev2, DM_REMOVE_NORMAL); + return 0; +} +DM_TEST(dm_test_gpio_devm, UT_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | UT_TESTF_SCAN_FDT); diff --git a/test/dm/test-fdt.c b/test/dm/test-fdt.c index 04802deb7f..26d57f40d1 100644 --- a/test/dm/test-fdt.c +++ b/test/dm/test-fdt.c @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ int dm_check_devices(struct unit_test_state *uts, int num_devices) /* Test that FDT-based binding works correctly */ static int dm_test_fdt(struct unit_test_state *uts) { - const int num_devices = 8; + const int num_devices = 9; struct udevice *dev; struct uclass *uc; int ret; @@ -473,12 +473,12 @@ static int dm_test_uclass_foreach(struct unit_test_state *uts) count = 0; uclass_id_foreach_dev(UCLASS_TEST_FDT, dev, uc) count++; - ut_asserteq(8, count); + ut_asserteq(9, count);
count = 0; uclass_foreach_dev(dev, uc) count++; - ut_asserteq(8, count); + ut_asserteq(9, count);
return 0; }

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:43:35PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com
Add a test to verify that GPIOs can be acquired/released using the managed API. Also check that the GPIOs are released when the consumer device is removed.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav p.yadav@ti.com
Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!
participants (2)
-
Pratyush Yadav
-
Tom Rini