[U-Boot] x86 Custodianship
Hi Wolfgang,
I've been a bit busy at home with bub #2 to chase this up, but have you decided whether or not to create an x86 repository? If so, I would be happy to take up custodianship of it and 'fly the flag' for U-Boot on the x86 platform.
I sent you my public RSA key earlier - let me know if you want me to resend
Regards,
Graeme
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4BF52993.80805@gmail.com you wrote:
I've been a bit busy at home with bub #2 to chase this up, but have you decided whether or not to create an x86 repository? If so, I would be happy to take up custodianship of it and 'fly the flag' for U-Boot on the x86 platform.
I sent you my public RSA key earlier - let me know if you want me to resend
No need to. The x86 repo is ready for you.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Hi Wolfgang,
On 22/05/10 01:11, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
[snip]
No need to. The x86 repo is ready for you.
Thanks Wolfgang
One quick question - Since I am currently the only x86 developer, how do you want to handle the SOB + Ack'd for x86 patches? I feel that to date be applying my patches you have implied your own Ack'd By. Should I wait for you (or somebody else) to Ack them before I apply them to the x86 repo?
I am more than happy (and would prefer) my patches to remain out of the x86 repo until formally Ack'd
Regards,
Graeme
Hi Graeme,
One quick question - Since I am currently the only x86 developer, how do you want to handle the SOB + Ack'd for x86 patches? I feel that to date be applying my patches you have implied your own Ack'd By. Should I wait for you (or somebody else) to Ack them before I apply them to the x86 repo?
I have been doing x86 firmware development for more years than I am prepared to admit to! As and when time allows then I am happy to muck in with the x86 development anywhere that I can.
Regards,
Andy.
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4BF74992.9000806@gmail.com you wrote:
One quick question - Since I am currently the only x86 developer, how do you want to handle the SOB + Ack'd for x86 patches? I feel that to date be applying my patches you have implied your own Ack'd By. Should I wait for you (or somebody else) to Ack them before I apply them to the x86 repo?
Not necessarily. As long as it's clearly architecture specific code only, just post the patche son the ML and allow for a number of days (I think 3 working days should be the minimum, 5 is almost always enough) and then feel free to apply them.
I am more than happy (and would prefer) my patches to remain out of the x86 repo until formally Ack'd
You need a number of x86 developers to get useful technical input; I don't know much about x86 so all I can usually is do is look at formal things like coding style violations and such :-(
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
participants (3)
-
Andy Pont -
Graeme Russ -
Wolfgang Denk