[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 1/1] imx: Get fec mac address from fuse
The patch is to support getting FEC MAC address from fuse bank.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64343@freescale.com
--- Changes for v2: - correct the mac address byte order according to review comments - add memset(edev, 0. sizeof(*edev)) when do fec_probe, - fix some code comments Changes for v3: - rebase - address the comments of Stefano, make the imx_get_mac_from_fuse(), declared independently inside each imx-regs.h to make it specific for each processor, because it accesses to different structures. - address the comments of Wolfgang and Stefano, use struct to access mac_addr fuse. Changes for v4: - Address the comments of Wolfgang, use fuse_regs instead of bank addres and change from fuse1_6 to fuse0_5 naming convention and use fuse_bank0_regs instead of fuse_bank0 to kill misleading. Changes for v5: - Fix the typo error of fuse5_31[0x11] as Wolfgang point out - Change the print message "got MAC address from EEPROM to "got MAC address from fuse" which comply with this commit title. Changes for v6: - Fix the mx27 res0 array size issue - Fix one coding style issue - use 0xff mask to clear that only the LSB of the read value is taken --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c | 12 ++++++++++ arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c | 12 ++++++++++ arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c | 14 ++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx25/imx-regs.h | 19 +++++++++------ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h | 20 +++++++++++------ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/fec_mxc.c | 17 +------------ 7 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c index b80a389..c6e1146 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c @@ -260,4 +260,16 @@ void mx25_fec_init_pins (void) writel (outpadctl, &padctl->pad_fec_tdata1);
} + +void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(unsigned char *mac) +{ + int i; + struct iim_regs *iim = (struct iim_regs *)IMX_IIM_BASE; + struct fuse_bank *bank = &iim->bank[0]; + struct fuse_bank0_regs *fuse = + (struct fuse_bank0_regs *)bank->fuse_regs; + + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) + mac[i] = readl(&fuse->mac_addr[i]) & 0xff; +} #endif /* CONFIG_FEC_MXC */ diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c index ae2ce58..27642bf 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c @@ -313,6 +313,18 @@ void mx27_fec_init_pins(void) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mode); i++) imx_gpio_mode(mode[i]); } + +void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(unsigned char *mac) +{ + int i; + struct iim_regs *iim = (struct iim_regs *)IMX_IIM_BASE; + struct fuse_bank *bank = &iim->bank[0]; + struct fuse_bank0_regs *fuse = + (struct fuse_bank0_regs *)bank->fuse_regs; + + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) + mac[6 - 1 - i] = readl(&fuse->mac_addr[i]) & 0xff; +} #endif /* CONFIG_FEC_MXC */
#ifdef CONFIG_MXC_MMC diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c index 7c7a565..2900119 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c @@ -100,6 +100,20 @@ int cpu_eth_init(bd_t *bis) return rc; }
+#if defined(CONFIG_FEC_MXC) +void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(unsigned char *mac) +{ + int i; + struct iim_regs *iim = (struct iim_regs *)IMX_IIM_BASE; + struct fuse_bank *bank = &iim->bank[1]; + struct fuse_bank1_regs *fuse = + (struct fuse_bank1_regs *)bank->fuse_regs; + + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) + mac[i] = readl(&fuse->mac_addr[i]) & 0xff; +} +#endif + /* * Initializes on-chip MMC controllers. * to override, implement board_mmc_init() diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx25/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx25/imx-regs.h index f5a2929..55ad115 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx25/imx-regs.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx25/imx-regs.h @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #ifdef CONFIG_FEC_MXC extern void mx25_fec_init_pins(void); +extern void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(unsigned char *mac); #endif
/* Clock Control Module (CCM) registers */ @@ -129,12 +130,17 @@ struct iim_regs { u32 iim_srev; u32 iim_prog_p; u32 res1[0x1f5]; - u32 iim_bank_area0[0x20]; - u32 res2[0xe0]; - u32 iim_bank_area1[0x20]; - u32 res3[0xe0]; - u32 iim_bank_area2[0x20]; + struct fuse_bank { + u32 fuse_regs[0x20]; + u32 fuse_rsvd[0xe0]; + } bank[3]; }; + +struct fuse_bank0_regs { + u32 fuse0_25[0x1a]; + u32 mac_addr[6]; +}; + #endif
/* AIPS 1 */ @@ -312,7 +318,4 @@ struct iim_regs { #define WSR_UNLOCK1 0x5555 #define WSR_UNLOCK2 0xAAAA
-/* FUSE bank offsets */ -#define IIM0_MAC 0x1a - #endif /* _IMX_REGS_H */ diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h index 6ecddaa..ff9a24a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ extern void mx27_uart_init_pins(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_FEC_MXC extern void mx27_fec_init_pins(void); +extern void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(unsigned char *mac); #endif /* CONFIG_FEC_MXC */
#ifdef CONFIG_MXC_MMC @@ -202,9 +203,19 @@ struct iim_regs { u32 iim_scs1; u32 iim_scs2; u32 iim_scs3; - u32 res[0x1F0]; - u32 iim_bank_area0[0x100]; + u32 res[0x1f1]; + struct fuse_bank { + u32 fuse_regs[0x20]; + u32 fuse_rsvd[0xe0]; + } bank[1]; }; + +struct fuse_bank0_regs { + u32 fuse0_3[4]; + u32 mac_addr[6]; + u32 fuse10_31[0x16]; +}; + #endif
#define IMX_IO_BASE 0x10000000 @@ -512,9 +523,4 @@ struct iim_regs { #define IIM_ERR_SNSE (1 << 2) #define IIM_ERR_PARITYE (1 << 1)
-/* Definitions for i.MX27 TO2 */ -#define IIM0_MAC 5 -#define IIM0_SCC_KEY 11 -#define IIM1_SUID 1 - #endif /* _IMX_REGS_H */ diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h index 0b6249a..d618bca 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h @@ -205,9 +205,13 @@ #define BOARD_REV_1_0 0x0 #define BOARD_REV_2_0 0x1
+#define IMX_IIM_BASE (IIM_BASE_ADDR) + #if !(defined(__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES) || defined(__ASSEMBLY__)) #include <asm/types.h>
+extern void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(unsigned char *mac); + #define __REG(x) (*((volatile u32 *)(x))) #define __REG16(x) (*((volatile u16 *)(x))) #define __REG8(x) (*((volatile u8 *)(x))) @@ -275,6 +279,36 @@ struct src { u32 sisr; u32 simr; }; + +struct iim_regs { + u32 stat; + u32 statm; + u32 err; + u32 emask; + u32 fctl; + u32 ua; + u32 la; + u32 sdat; + u32 prev; + u32 srev; + u32 preg_p; + u32 scs0; + u32 scs1; + u32 scs2; + u32 scs3; + u32 res0[0x1f1]; + struct fuse_bank { + u32 fuse_regs[0x20]; + u32 fuse_rsvd[0xe0]; + } bank[4]; +}; + +struct fuse_bank1_regs { + u32 fuse0_8[9]; + u32 mac_addr[6]; + u32 fuse15_31[0x11]; +}; + #endif /* __ASSEMBLER__*/
#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_MXC_MX51_H__ */ diff --git a/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c b/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c index c17f937..0d0f392 100644 --- a/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c +++ b/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c @@ -312,21 +312,8 @@ static void fec_rbd_clean(int last, struct fec_bd *pRbd)
static int fec_get_hwaddr(struct eth_device *dev, unsigned char *mac) { -/* - * The MX27 can store the mac address in internal eeprom - * This mechanism is not supported now by MX51 or MX25 - */ -#if defined(CONFIG_MX51) || defined(CONFIG_MX25) - return -1; -#else - struct iim_regs *iim = (struct iim_regs *)IMX_IIM_BASE; - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) - mac[6-1-i] = readl(&iim->iim_bank_area0[IIM0_MAC + i]); - + imx_get_mac_from_fuse(mac); return !is_valid_ether_addr(mac); -#endif }
static int fec_set_hwaddr(struct eth_device *dev) @@ -754,7 +741,7 @@ static int fec_probe(bd_t *bd) eth_register(edev);
if (fec_get_hwaddr(edev, ethaddr) == 0) { - printf("got MAC address from EEPROM: %pM\n", ethaddr); + printf("got MAC address from fuse: %pM\n", ethaddr); memcpy(edev->enetaddr, ethaddr, 6); }
On 11/18/2010 12:49 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
The patch is to support getting FEC MAC address from fuse bank.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64343@freescale.com
Hi Jason,
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h index 0b6249a..d618bca 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h @@ -205,9 +205,13 @@ #define BOARD_REV_1_0 0x0 #define BOARD_REV_2_0 0x1
+#define IMX_IIM_BASE (IIM_BASE_ADDR)
#if !(defined(__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES) || defined(__ASSEMBLY__)) #include <asm/types.h>
+extern void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(unsigned char *mac);
#define __REG(x) (*((volatile u32 *)(x))) #define __REG16(x) (*((volatile u16 *)(x))) #define __REG8(x) (*((volatile u8 *)(x))) @@ -275,6 +279,36 @@ struct src { u32 sisr; u32 simr; };
+struct iim_regs {
- u32 stat;
Space before tabs:
+^Iu32 ^Istat;$
You should run checkpatch on your patch. It checks for such kind of problems.
- u32 statm;
^--- Space before tabs
The same for all fields in the structure.
I applied your patch and I tested on a i.MX27 Lite board. The result does not seem correct. According to the manual, the mac address is store at address 0x10028814. Rather there is no stored MAC at this address on my board, but your patch read the MAC from address 0x10028810 (I traced the address of fuse->mac_addr).
The reported address is what we can see at 0x10028810 (Word 4 of fusebank 0):
md 0x10028804 10028804: 00000020 00000081 00000040 00000010 .......@....... 10028814: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
And u-boot reports : Address in SROM is 00:00:00:00:00:10 Address in environment is 00:aa:dd:cc:11:22
It seems you read at a wrong address.
Best regards, Stefano Babic
Hi, Stefano,
2010/11/18 Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de:
On 11/18/2010 12:49 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
The patch is to support getting FEC MAC address from fuse bank.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64343@freescale.com
Hi Jason,
I applied your patch and I tested on a i.MX27 Lite board. The result does not seem correct. According to the manual, the mac address is store at address 0x10028814. Rather there is no stored MAC at this address on my board, but your patch read the MAC from address 0x10028810 (I traced the address of fuse->mac_addr).
The reported address is what we can see at 0x10028810 (Word 4 of fusebank 0):
md 0x10028804 10028804: 00000020 00000081 00000040 00000010 .......@....... 10028814: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
And u-boot reports : Address in SROM is 00:00:00:00:00:10 Address in environment is 00:aa:dd:cc:11:22
It seems you read at a wrong address.
I think you are right. I did not have the mx27 board to do test. Thanks for test.
I only test it on mx51babbage board, the following is the output:
Net: got MAC address from fuse: 00:04:9f:00:f7:78 which is the same as the MAC address programmed on the board.
Best regards, Stefano Babic
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi, Stefano,
2010/11/19 Jason Liu liu.h.jason@gmail.com:
Hi, Stefano,
2010/11/18 Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de:
On 11/18/2010 12:49 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
The patch is to support getting FEC MAC address from fuse bank.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64343@freescale.com
Hi Jason,
I applied your patch and I tested on a i.MX27 Lite board. The result does not seem correct. According to the manual, the mac address is store at address 0x10028814. Rather there is no stored MAC at this address on my board, but your patch read the MAC from address 0x10028810 (I traced the address of fuse->mac_addr).
The reported address is what we can see at 0x10028810 (Word 4 of fusebank 0):
md 0x10028804 10028804: 00000020 00000081 00000040 00000010 .......@....... 10028814: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
And u-boot reports : Address in SROM is 00:00:00:00:00:10 Address in environment is 00:aa:dd:cc:11:22
It seems you read at a wrong address.
I think you are right. I did not have the mx27 board to do test. Thanks for test.
I only test it on mx51babbage board, the following is the output:
Net: got MAC address from fuse: 00:04:9f:00:f7:78 which is the same as the MAC address programmed on the board.
Do you have any other comments about this patch?
BR, Jason
Best regards, Stefano Babic
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On 11/19/2010 07:44 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
I think you are right. I did not have the mx27 board to do test. Thanks for test.
I only test it on mx51babbage board, the following is the output:
Net: got MAC address from fuse: 00:04:9f:00:f7:78 which is the same as the MAC address programmed on the board.
Do you have any other comments about this patch?
As I have not seen any other comments in the ML, I have tried to apply the patch and to test myself. From my point of view we have to be sure that the patch is working for all supported processors, and I can test it for i.MX27. As you already test it on i.MX51, can you test it on i.MX25 ? Or at least check with tracing if the address is correct for this processor, too ?
Best regards, Stefano Babic
2010/11/19 Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de:
On 11/19/2010 07:44 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
I think you are right. I did not have the mx27 board to do test. Thanks for test.
I only test it on mx51babbage board, the following is the output:
Net: got MAC address from fuse: 00:04:9f:00:f7:78 which is the same as the MAC address programmed on the board.
Do you have any other comments about this patch?
As I have not seen any other comments in the ML, I have tried to apply the patch and to test myself. From my point of view we have to be sure that the patch is working for all supported processors, and I can test it for i.MX27. As you already test it on i.MX51, can you test it on i.MX25 ? Or at least check with tracing if the address is correct for this processor, too ?
OK, if you have no other comments, I would like to send v7 to fix the mx27 and checkpatch issue per your review in order to avoid too much versions of patch. :(
But I don't have mx25 support board to test it. I just have one mx25 3ds board on hand but it seems that this board is not got support in uboot upstream currently.
Is there anyone on the ML can do me one favor to test it on MX25 like on karo/tx25?
Thanks in advance.
BR, Jason
Best regards, Stefano Babic
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de =====================================================================
On 11/19/2010 09:10 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
Is there anyone on the ML can do me one favor to test it on MX25 like on karo/tx25?
I have checked and I can test here at DENX on a i.MX25. I will do his job.
Best regards, Stefano Babic
participants (3)
-
Jason Liu -
Jason Liu -
Stefano Babic