Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 v2] Exynos: Change get_timer() to work correctly

Thanks for your comments. Please find the reply corresponding to comments below.
Dear Akshay,
On 28/02/13 19:59, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
At present get_timer() does not return sane values. It should count up smoothly in milliscond intervals.
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c index 44d7bc3..3147f59 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/pwm.c @@ -174,6 +174,12 @@ int pwm_init(int pwm_id, int div, int invert)
/* set count value */ offset = pwm_id * 3;
- /*
* TODO(sjg): Use this as a countdown timer for now. We count down
* from the maximum value to 0, then reset.
*/
- timer_rate_hz = -1;
is it workaround?
Yes, this is a part of workaround to get appropriate ticks.
writel(timer_rate_hz, &pwm->tcntb0 + offset);
val = readl(&pwm->tcon) & ~(0xf << TCON_OFFSET(pwm_id)); diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c index e78c716..c48a297 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c @@ -39,13 +39,33 @@ static inline struct s5p_timer *s5p_get_base_timer(void) return (struct s5p_timer *)samsung_get_base_timer(); }
+/**
- Read the countdown timer.
- This operates at 1MHz and counts downwards. It will wrap about every
- hour (2^32 microseconds).
- @return current value of timer
- */
+static unsigned long timer_get_us_down(void) +{
- struct s5p_timer *const timer = s5p_get_base_timer();
- return readl(&timer->tcnto4);
+}
int timer_init(void) { /* PWM Timer 4 */
- pwm_init(4, MUX_DIV_2, 0);
- pwm_init(4, MUX_DIV_4, 0);
There are special reason to change the div value? Please let me know.
We wish to count down at 1MHz, providing a resolution of 1us. This becomes possible with MUX_DIV_4 for timer 4, since, exynos 5250 manual says that for 4-bit divider settings at 1/4 (PCLK = 66 MHz ), we get 66637.07 seconds interval.
/* delay x useconds */ void __udelay(unsigned long usec) {
- struct s5p_timer *const timer = s5p_get_base_timer();
- unsigned long tmo, tmp, count_value;
- count_value = readl(&timer->tcntb4);
- if (usec >= 1000) {
/*
* if "big" number, spread normalization
* to seconds
* 1. start to normalize for usec to ticks per sec
* 2. find number of "ticks" to wait to achieve target
* 3. finish normalize.
*/
tmo = usec / 1000;
tmo *= (CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value);
tmo /= 1000;
- } else {
/* else small number, don't kill it prior to HZ multiply */
tmo = usec * CONFIG_SYS_HZ * count_value;
tmo /= (1000 * 1000);
- }
- /* get current timestamp */
- tmp = get_current_tick();
- /* if setting this fordward will roll time stamp */
- /* reset "advancing" timestamp to 0, set lastinc value */
- /* else, set advancing stamp wake up time */
- if ((tmo + tmp + 1) < tmp)
reset_timer_masked();
- else
tmo += tmp;
- /* loop till event */
- while (get_current_tick() < tmo)
; /* nop */
- unsigned long count_value;
- count_value = timer_get_us_down();
- while ((int)(count_value - timer_get_us_down()) < (int)usec)
why convert to int?
To avoid side effects of compiler optimizations.
;
}
void reset_timer_masked(void) @@ -109,30 +109,6 @@ void reset_timer_masked(void) gd->arch.tbl = 0; }
-unsigned long get_timer_masked(void) -{
- struct s5p_timer *const timer = s5p_get_base_timer();
- unsigned long count_value = readl(&timer->tcntb4);
- return get_current_tick() / count_value;
-}
- This function is derived from PowerPC code (read timebase as long long).
- On ARM it just returns the timer value.
Thanks, Minkyu Kang.
Regards, Akshay Saraswat
participants (1)
-
Akshay Saraswat