Re: [PATCH 4/7] riscv: Add SMP Kconfig option dependency for U-Boot proper
Hi Sean
From: Sean Anderson [mailto:seanga2@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2020 10:21 PM To: Bin Meng; Rick Jian-Zhi Chen(陳建志); Lukas Auer; Anup Patel; Atish Patra; Pragnesh Patel; U-Boot Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] riscv: Add SMP Kconfig option dependency for U-Boot proper
On 4/8/20 9:41 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
U-Boot proper running in S-mode only need SMP support when using SBI v0.1. With SBI v0.2 HSM extension, it does not need implement multicore boot in U-Boot proper.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index 10478ae..502143f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ config SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN
config SMP bool "Symmetric Multi-Processing"
depends on SBI_V01So should this be
"depends on SBI_V01 or RISCV_PRIV_1_9"
when the priv spec 1.9 patch gets merged?
Your series: [v7,22/22] riscv: Add Sipeed Maix support
There are some patchs still need to be fixed:
[v7,22/22] riscv: Add Sipeed Maix support https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1258463/
[v7,15/22] riscv: Clean up IPI initialization code https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1258461/
And there are two patchs about clk still get no positive response from clk maintainer
[v7,05/22] clk: Add functions to register CCF clock structs https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1258446/
[v7,04/22] clk: Fix clk_get_by_* handling of index https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1258442/
Thanks Rick
help This enables support for systems with more than one CPU. If you say N here, U-Boot will run on single and multiprocessor--Sean
On 4/10/20 4:27 AM, Rick Chen wrote:
Hi Sean
From: Sean Anderson [mailto:seanga2@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2020 10:21 PM To: Bin Meng; Rick Jian-Zhi Chen(陳建志); Lukas Auer; Anup Patel; Atish Patra; Pragnesh Patel; U-Boot Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] riscv: Add SMP Kconfig option dependency for U-Boot proper
On 4/8/20 9:41 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
U-Boot proper running in S-mode only need SMP support when using SBI v0.1. With SBI v0.2 HSM extension, it does not need implement multicore boot in U-Boot proper.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index 10478ae..502143f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ config SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN
config SMP bool "Symmetric Multi-Processing"
depends on SBI_V01So should this be
"depends on SBI_V01 or RISCV_PRIV_1_9"
when the priv spec 1.9 patch gets merged?
Your series: [v7,22/22] riscv: Add Sipeed Maix support
There are some patchs still need to be fixed:
[v7,22/22] riscv: Add Sipeed Maix support https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1258463/
[v7,15/22] riscv: Clean up IPI initialization code https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1258461/
And there are two patchs about clk still get no positive response from clk maintainer
[v7,05/22] clk: Add functions to register CCF clock structs https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1258446/
[v7,04/22] clk: Fix clk_get_by_* handling of index https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1258442/
Yeah, I was waiting on a response wrt those patches before doing v8. I may try reworking the series so the first patch is unnecessary, but I don't think that will be possible with the second patch. I'm working on other projects at the moment, so I don't know if I'll have time to do that.
--Sean
participants (2)
-
Rick Chen -
Sean Anderson