GCC 6.2 reasonably complains about the current code:

../cmd/tpm_test.c: In function ‘do_tpmtest’: ../cmd/tpm_test.c:540:3: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) ^~~ ../cmd/tpm_test.c:542:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘for’ printf("\n------\n"); ^~~~~~

Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de --- cmd/tpm_test.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cmd/tpm_test.c b/cmd/tpm_test.c index 65332d1..4af4d71 100644 --- a/cmd/tpm_test.c +++ b/cmd/tpm_test.c @@ -534,13 +534,12 @@ static int do_tpmtest(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[]) cmd_tbl_t *c;

printf("argc = %d, argv = ", argc); - do { - int i = 0;

- for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) - printf(" %s", argv[i]); - printf("\n------\n"); - } while (0); + for (int i = 0; i < argc; i++) + printf(" %s", argv[i]); + + printf("\n------\n"); + argc--; argv++; c = find_cmd_tbl(argv[0], cmd_cros_tpm_sub,