[U-Boot-Users] downsizing u-boot below 64K for arm926ejs based platforms
Hi all
Have anybody achieved u-boot size below 64K for arm0926ejs based platform?
I am working on the same, any inputs will be helpful..
Regards.
Prafulla . .
Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla <at> marvell.com> writes:
Hi all
Hi there
Have anybody achieved u-boot size below 64K for arm0926ejs based platform?
Usually das U-Boot is about double the size you're requesting and depending on the required features you might have a hard time getting there. A better approach might be to boot in several phases as e.g. done when booting from NAND.
What exactly are you trying to achieve? Why would it have to be less than 64K in size?
Cheers
Marcel
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 10:48 +0000, Marcel Ziswilen wrote:
Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla <at> marvell.com> writes:
Hi all
Hi there
Hi Marcel Thanks for your responce,
Have anybody achieved u-boot size below 64K for arm0926ejs based platform?
Usually das U-Boot is about double the size you're requesting and depending on the required features you might have a hard time getting there. A better approach might be to boot in several phases as e.g. done when booting from NAND.
What exactly are you trying to achieve? Why would it have to be less than 64K in size?
We have tight size restriction, entire system needs to fit within 2MB of flash, so I need to downsize u-boot as much as I can, What I need only boot from NAND and tftp support.
How about removing jffs2 support and booting from raw flash?
Cheers
Marcel
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
participants (2)
-
Marcel Ziswiler -
Prafulla Wadaskar