[U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM646x: Update flag used to represent DM646x SOC's
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paulraj@ti.com
In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code. This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of SOCs we use the flag CONFIG_SOC_DM644X. We want some uniformity.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paulraj@ti.com --- include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h | 4 ++-- include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h index ae75f84..96bc80e 100644 --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ #define EMAC_MDIO_BASE_ADDR (0x01c84000) #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646x +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646X /* MDIO module input frequency */ #define EMAC_MDIO_BUS_FREQ 76500000 /* MDIO clock output frequency */ @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ typedef struct {
/* EMAC Wrapper Registers Structure */ typedef struct { -#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM646x) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM365) +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM646X) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM365) dv_reg IDVER; dv_reg SOFTRST; dv_reg EMCTRL; diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h index 386540e..10f3a39 100644 --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646x +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646X #define MASK_CLE 0x80000 #define MASK_ALE 0x40000 #else
s-paulraj@ti.com wrote:
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paulraj@ti.com
In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code. This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of SOCs we use the flag CONFIG_SOC_DM644X. We want some uniformity.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paulraj@ti.com
Which board defines CONFIG_SOC_DM646X? I could not find it in a simple grep.
Otherwise.. Ack-ed Tom
include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h | 4 ++-- include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h index ae75f84..96bc80e 100644 --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ #define EMAC_MDIO_BASE_ADDR (0x01c84000) #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646x +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646X /* MDIO module input frequency */ #define EMAC_MDIO_BUS_FREQ 76500000 /* MDIO clock output frequency */ @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ typedef struct {
/* EMAC Wrapper Registers Structure */ typedef struct { -#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM646x) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM365) +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM646X) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM365) dv_reg IDVER; dv_reg SOFTRST; dv_reg EMCTRL; diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h index 386540e..10f3a39 100644 --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646x +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646X #define MASK_CLE 0x80000 #define MASK_ALE 0x40000 #else
s-paulraj@ti.com wrote:
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paulraj@ti.com
In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code. This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of SOCs we use the flag CONFIG_SOC_DM644X. We want some uniformity.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paulraj@ti.com
Which board defines CONFIG_SOC_DM646X? I could not find it in a simple grep.
Otherwise.. Ack-ed Tom
No board uses it as of now. But there is some support for DM646x(DaVinci-HD) based chips in the present source in the form of some entries in the hardware.h file and 1 DM646x SOC specific file. IIRC patches were sent some months ago for DM646x but got lost in the list.
Thanks, Sandeep
participants (3)
-
Paulraj, Sandeep -
s-paulraj＠ti.com
-
Tom