[U-Boot-Users] u-boot wiki and arch-specific details
we maintain a Blackfin-specific u-boot wiki that goes into quite a bit of detail, some of which is duplicated with the main u-boot wiki. how do people feel about extending the u-boot wiki to allow for arch-specific details ? -mike
Hi Mike,
we maintain a Blackfin-specific u-boot wiki that goes into quite a bit of detail, some of which is duplicated with the main u-boot wiki. how do people feel about extending the u-boot wiki to allow for arch-specific details ?
What exactly do you have in mind? I surely don't see any principal problem here.
It would certainly be valuable to get all U-Boot related info collected in a central place and have pointers wherever that make sense...
Cheers Detlev
On Monday 14 April 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote:
we maintain a Blackfin-specific u-boot wiki that goes into quite a bit of detail, some of which is duplicated with the main u-boot wiki. how do people feel about extending the u-boot wiki to allow for arch-specific details ?
What exactly do you have in mind? I surely don't see any principal problem here.
It would certainly be valuable to get all U-Boot related info collected in a central place and have pointers wherever that make sense...
from my reading of the wiki, it's more of a technical/command reference than a guide. the wiki we maintain is geared to be more of a guide. i think the two can be merged, i just dont want to convert things only to find out people dont want to take it that direction. -mike
Hi Mike,
On Monday 14 April 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote:
we maintain a Blackfin-specific u-boot wiki that goes into quite a bit of detail, some of which is duplicated with the main u-boot wiki. how do people feel about extending the u-boot wiki to allow for arch-specific details ?
What exactly do you have in mind? I surely don't see any principal problem here.
It would certainly be valuable to get all U-Boot related info collected in a central place and have pointers wherever that make sense...
from my reading of the wiki, it's more of a technical/command reference than a guide. the wiki we maintain is geared to be more of a guide. i think the two can be merged, i just dont want to convert things only to find out people dont want to take it that direction.
Just to be clear, we are discussing the DULG wiki, right?
I agree that in the current state the documentation is more a reference but IIRC that wasn't really a conscious design decision. It simply turned out this way in the end.
So I do not see any general problem in adding "guide style" sections in there. Maybe then most of the current documentation can then be shifted to a "commands reference" section.
One problem I see though is how to correctly adapt such sections to the board specific nature of the DULG. Hopefully we can get away with mostly generic text passages and only a few ifdefs. It would be very helpful to know more concrete plans (outline!) to think further about these implications.
Cheers Detlev
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Monday 14 April 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote:
we maintain a Blackfin-specific u-boot wiki that goes into quite a bit of detail, some of which is duplicated with the main u-boot wiki. how do people feel about extending the u-boot wiki to allow for arch-specific details ?
What exactly do you have in mind? I surely don't see any principal problem here.
It would certainly be valuable to get all U-Boot related info collected in a central place and have pointers wherever that make sense...
from my reading of the wiki, it's more of a technical/command reference than a guide. the wiki we maintain is geared to be more of a guide. i think the two can be merged, i just dont want to convert things only to find out people dont want to take it that direction.
Just to be clear, we are discussing the DULG wiki, right?
is there any other worth talking about :)
I agree that in the current state the documentation is more a reference but IIRC that wasn't really a conscious design decision. It simply turned out this way in the end.
So I do not see any general problem in adding "guide style" sections in there. Maybe then most of the current documentation can then be shifted to a "commands reference" section.
OK
One problem I see though is how to correctly adapt such sections to the board specific nature of the DULG. Hopefully we can get away with mostly generic text passages and only a few ifdefs. It would be very helpful to know more concrete plans (outline!) to think further about these implications.
so talking to some people on our side and i realized i forgot about a lame (but important) aspect. we need to retain full copyright over our docs. we license it all under a non commercial creative commons license, but sometimes we get customer requests to include portions of our docs into their work but under their own rules. if i were to merge the our wiki with the DULG one, we couldnt in good faith continue that practice. so the wiki's will have to remain sep, but i can push content into the public one to improve it, just not vice versa. -mike
participants (2)
-
Detlev Zundel -
Mike Frysinger