[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spi: zynq_qspi: Minor cleanups

- Use __func__ on debug - Removed unnecessary comment - Fix function name in debug as zynq_qspi_xfer instead of spi_xfer
Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki jteki@openedev.com --- Changes for v2: - Fix commit message - Use meaningful commit header, add proper details for all fixes. - Fix debug print in zynq_qspi_xfer
drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c b/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c index 8aa61d7..6963c13 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c @@ -430,7 +430,6 @@ static int zynq_qspi_start_transfer(struct zynq_qspi_priv *priv) zynq_qspi_fill_tx_fifo(priv, priv->fifo_depth);
writel(ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_ALL_MASK, ®s->ier); - /* Start the transfer by enabling manual start bit */
/* wait for completion */ do { @@ -516,7 +515,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen, priv->rx_buf = din; priv->len = bitlen / 8;
- debug("spi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n", + debug("zynq_qspi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n", bus->seq, slave_plat->cs, bitlen, priv->len, flags);
/* @@ -569,8 +568,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_set_speed(struct udevice *bus, uint speed) writel(confr, ®s->cr); priv->freq = speed;
- debug("zynq_spi_set_speed: regs=%p, speed=%d\n", - priv->regs, priv->freq); + debug("%s: regs=%p, speed=%d\n", __func__, priv->regs, priv->freq);
return 0; } @@ -593,7 +591,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_set_mode(struct udevice *bus, uint mode) writel(confr, ®s->cr); priv->mode = mode;
- debug("zynq_spi_set_mode: regs=%p, mode=%d\n", priv->regs, priv->mode); + debug("%s: regs=%p, mode=%d\n", __func__, priv->regs, priv->mode);
return 0; }

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:49:57PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
- Use __func__ on debug
- Removed unnecessary comment
- Fix function name in debug as zynq_qspi_xfer instead of spi_xfer
Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki jteki@openedev.com
Changes for v2:
- Fix commit message - Use meaningful commit header, add proper details for all fixes.
- Fix debug print in zynq_qspi_xfer
drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c b/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c index 8aa61d7..6963c13 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c @@ -430,7 +430,6 @@ static int zynq_qspi_start_transfer(struct zynq_qspi_priv *priv) zynq_qspi_fill_tx_fifo(priv, priv->fifo_depth);
writel(ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_ALL_MASK, ®s->ier);
/* Start the transfer by enabling manual start bit */
/* wait for completion */ do {
@@ -516,7 +515,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen, priv->rx_buf = din; priv->len = bitlen / 8;
- debug("spi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n",
debug("zynq_qspi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n", bus->seq, slave_plat->cs, bitlen, priv->len, flags);
/*
I'm not poking the code regularly myself so, ok, sure. But why not __func__? I don't get it.

On 26 October 2015 at 00:21, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:49:57PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
- Use __func__ on debug
- Removed unnecessary comment
- Fix function name in debug as zynq_qspi_xfer instead of spi_xfer
Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki jteki@openedev.com
Changes for v2: - Fix commit message - Use meaningful commit header, add proper details for all fixes. - Fix debug print in zynq_qspi_xfer
drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c b/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c index 8aa61d7..6963c13 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c @@ -430,7 +430,6 @@ static int zynq_qspi_start_transfer(struct zynq_qspi_priv *priv) zynq_qspi_fill_tx_fifo(priv, priv->fifo_depth);
writel(ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_ALL_MASK, ®s->ier);
/* Start the transfer by enabling manual start bit */ /* wait for completion */ do {
@@ -516,7 +515,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen, priv->rx_buf = din; priv->len = bitlen / 8;
debug("spi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n",
debug("zynq_qspi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n", bus->seq, slave_plat->cs, bitlen, priv->len, flags); /*
I'm not poking the code regularly myself so, ok, sure. But why not __func__? I don't get it.
I prefer __func__ for large function name and function being called less times and in case zynq_qspi_xfer I would go directly use function name as it being called for each transaction and function name is also small. It's not the case with remaining once.
participants (2)
-
Jagan Teki
-
Tom Rini