[U-Boot] WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
Booting my t1042 I get: Loading Ramdisk to 2e639000, end 2ffffcc4 ... OK Loading Device Tree to 03fe4000, end 03fffd45 ... OK WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND ....
This apperas to come from base_liodn = fdt_getprop(fdt, off, "fsl,liodn", &rc); if (!base_liodn) { char path[64];
if (fdt_get_path(fdt, off, path, sizeof(path)) < 0) strcpy(path, "(unknown)"); printf("WARNING Could not get liodn of node %s: %s\n", path, fdt_strerror(rc)); continue; }
but I cannot find out what what this property should be. Anyone?
On 10/24/2014 08:39 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Booting my t1042 I get: Loading Ramdisk to 2e639000, end 2ffffcc4 ... OK Loading Device Tree to 03fe4000, end 03fffd45 ... OK WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND ....
This apperas to come from base_liodn = fdt_getprop(fdt, off, "fsl,liodn", &rc); if (!base_liodn) { char path[64];
if (fdt_get_path(fdt, off, path, sizeof(path)) <
strcpy(path, "(unknown)"); printf("WARNING Could not get liodn of node %s:%s\n", path, fdt_strerror(rc)); continue; }
but I cannot find out what what this property should be. Anyone?
Laurentiu,
Can you take a look?
York
York Sun yorksun@freescale.com wrote on 2014/10/24 18:02:03:
On 10/24/2014 08:39 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Booting my t1042 I get: Loading Ramdisk to 2e639000, end 2ffffcc4 ... OK Loading Device Tree to 03fe4000, end 03fffd45 ... OK WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND ....
This apperas to come from base_liodn = fdt_getprop(fdt, off, "fsl,liodn", &rc); if (!base_liodn) { char path[64];
if (fdt_get_path(fdt, off, path, sizeof(path))
<
strcpy(path, "(unknown)"); printf("WARNING Could not get liodn of node
%s:
%s\n", path, fdt_strerror(rc)); continue; }
but I cannot find out what what this property should be. Anyone?
Laurentiu,
Can you take a look?
York
I might have missed it, but did this go anywhere?
Jocke
On 11/23/2014 11:30 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
York Sun yorksun@freescale.com wrote on 2014/10/24 18:02:03:
On 10/24/2014 08:39 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Booting my t1042 I get: Loading Ramdisk to 2e639000, end 2ffffcc4 ... OK Loading Device Tree to 03fe4000, end 03fffd45 ... OK WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND ....
This apperas to come from base_liodn = fdt_getprop(fdt, off, "fsl,liodn", &rc); if (!base_liodn) { char path[64];
if (fdt_get_path(fdt, off, path, sizeof(path))<
strcpy(path, "(unknown)"); printf("WARNING Could not get liodn of node%s:
%s\n", path, fdt_strerror(rc)); continue; }
but I cannot find out what what this property should be. Anyone?
Laurentiu,
Can you take a look?
York
I might have missed it, but did this go anywhere?
No. It didn't go anywhere. Laurentiu, can you follow up?
York
On 11/24/2014 06:57 PM, York Sun wrote:
On 11/23/2014 11:30 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
York Sun yorksun@freescale.com wrote on 2014/10/24 18:02:03:
On 10/24/2014 08:39 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Booting my t1042 I get: Loading Ramdisk to 2e639000, end 2ffffcc4 ... OK Loading Device Tree to 03fe4000, end 03fffd45 ... OK WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND ....
This apperas to come from base_liodn = fdt_getprop(fdt, off, "fsl,liodn", &rc); if (!base_liodn) { char path[64];
if (fdt_get_path(fdt, off, path, sizeof(path))<
strcpy(path, "(unknown)"); printf("WARNING Could not get liodn of node%s:
%s\n", path, fdt_strerror(rc)); continue; }
but I cannot find out what what this property should be. Anyone?
Laurentiu,
Can you take a look?
York
I might have missed it, but did this go anywhere?
No. It didn't go anywhere. Laurentiu, can you follow up?
Hi Jocke, York,
Sorry for the late reply. I didn't noticed the thread in time.
You need this patch:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411910/
--- Best Regards, Laurentiu
Laurentiu Tudor b10716@freescale.com wrote on 2014/11/25 09:49:22:
On 11/24/2014 06:57 PM, York Sun wrote:
On 11/23/2014 11:30 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
York Sun yorksun@freescale.com wrote on 2014/10/24 18:02:03:
On 10/24/2014 08:39 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Booting my t1042 I get: Loading Ramdisk to 2e639000, end 2ffffcc4 ... OK Loading Device Tree to 03fe4000, end 03fffd45 ... OK WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000:
FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000:
FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000:
FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000:
FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
....
This apperas to come from base_liodn = fdt_getprop(fdt, off, "fsl,liodn",
&rc);
if (!base_liodn) { char path[64]; if (fdt_get_path(fdt, off, path,
sizeof(path))
<
strcpy(path, "(unknown)"); printf("WARNING Could not get liodn of node
%s:
%s\n", path, fdt_strerror(rc)); continue; }
but I cannot find out what what this property should be. Anyone?
Laurentiu,
Can you take a look?
York
I might have missed it, but did this go anywhere?
No. It didn't go anywhere. Laurentiu, can you follow up?
Hi Jocke, York,
Sorry for the late reply. I didn't noticed the thread in time.
You need this patch:
Great, I guess this will hit upstream any day now?
Jocke
On 11/26/2014 10:55 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Laurentiu Tudor b10716@freescale.com wrote on 2014/11/25 09:49:22:
On 11/24/2014 06:57 PM, York Sun wrote:
On 11/23/2014 11:30 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
York Sun yorksun@freescale.com wrote on 2014/10/24 18:02:03:
On 10/24/2014 08:39 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Booting my t1042 I get: Loading Ramdisk to 2e639000, end 2ffffcc4 ... OK Loading Device Tree to 03fe4000, end 03fffd45 ... OK WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000:
FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000:
FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe240000:
FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
WARNING Could not get liodn of node /pcie@ffe250000:
FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
....
This apperas to come from base_liodn = fdt_getprop(fdt, off, "fsl,liodn",
&rc);
if (!base_liodn) { char path[64]; if (fdt_get_path(fdt, off, path,sizeof(path))
<
strcpy(path, "(unknown)"); printf("WARNING Could not get liodn of node%s:
%s\n", path, fdt_strerror(rc)); continue; }
but I cannot find out what what this property should be. Anyone?
Laurentiu,
Can you take a look?
York
I might have missed it, but did this go anywhere?
No. It didn't go anywhere. Laurentiu, can you follow up?
Hi Jocke, York,
Sorry for the late reply. I didn't noticed the thread in time.
You need this patch:
Great, I guess this will hit upstream any day now?
I'm thinking York will pick it up in one of the following pull requests.
--- Best Regards, Laurentiu
On 11/26/2014 04:34 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
Hi Jocke, York,
Sorry for the late reply. I didn't noticed the thread in time.
You need this patch:
Great, I guess this will hit upstream any day now?
I'm thinking York will pick it up in one of the following pull requests.
I am merging patches in the order of date received. We will get there eventually.
York
York Sun yorksun@freescale.com wrote on 2014/12/01 18:26:21:
On 11/26/2014 04:34 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
Hi Jocke, York,
Sorry for the late reply. I didn't noticed the thread in time.
You need this patch:
Great, I guess this will hit upstream any day now?
I'm thinking York will pick it up in one of the following pull
requests.
I am merging patches in the order of date received. We will get there
eventually.
May I suggest bug fixes gets priority and are fast tracked?
Jocke
On 12/01/2014 10:31 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
York Sun yorksun@freescale.com wrote on 2014/12/01 18:26:21:
On 11/26/2014 04:34 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
Hi Jocke, York,
Sorry for the late reply. I didn't noticed the thread in time.
You need this patch:
Great, I guess this will hit upstream any day now?
I'm thinking York will pick it up in one of the following pull
requests.
I am merging patches in the order of date received. We will get there
eventually.
May I suggest bug fixes gets priority and are fast tracked?
Bug fix has priority. It is not about schedule, but about my capability to test each patch. Next release is schedule to be mid January. Before that you can apply the patch locally.
York
participants (3)
-
Joakim Tjernlund -
Laurentiu Tudor -
York Sun