[U-Boot] uboot support to Allwinner bananapi zero
Hi Icenowy & Jagan,
I see bananapi zero patch was posted and discussed in [1], but without further follow up. Maybe we can decide which name is more maintainable first, bananapi-*, Bananapi-* or Sinovoip_BPI_*. And add all new boards with following the rule. Which one do you prefer?
If possible, we can create symbol link or just rename files later as it may cause issue for end user.
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/832937/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9753547/
Jun
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Jun Nie jun.nie@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Icenowy & Jagan,
I see bananapi zero patch was posted and discussed in [1], but without further follow up. Maybe we can decide which name is more maintainable first, bananapi-*, Bananapi-* or Sinovoip_BPI_*. And add all new boards with following the rule. Which one do you prefer?
about defconfig?
I would prefer bananapi_m2_zero_defconfig since I've used same with recent banana boards which I've added.
Jagan.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.teki@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Jun Nie jun.nie@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Icenowy & Jagan,
I see bananapi zero patch was posted and discussed in [1], but without further follow up. Maybe we can decide which name is more maintainable first, bananapi-*, Bananapi-* or Sinovoip_BPI_*. And add all new boards with following the rule. Which one do you prefer?
about defconfig?
I would prefer bananapi_m2_zero_defconfig since I've used same with recent banana boards which I've added.
Bananapi is better than Sinovoip IMO. I asked them and the Sinovoip brand is for their original VoIP hardware. The BPI SBCs are under the Bananapi brand (and company).
ChenYu
participants (3)
-
Chen-Yu Tsai -
Jagan Teki -
Jun Nie