[U-Boot] net, phy: wrong 1000BASE detection with a lan9303 switch

Hello,
I have problems with a lan9303 switch on an am335x based board, which does not support 1000FD/HD modes, but as it set BMSR_ERCAP bit in BMSR and returns 0xffff for reads on the MII_STAT1000 and MII_CTRL1000 registers, u-boot code detects SPEED_1000 in drivers/net/phy/phy.c genphy_parse_link() ... which is wrong, as this switch does not support 1000 modes ...
I found in ./common/miiphyutil.c miiphy_speed() the define CONFIG_PHY_GIGE which it seems lacks in drivers/net/phy/phy.c genphy_parse_link() ? Or is there another option?
bye, Heiko

Hello,
Am 10.07.2013 12:09, schrieb Heiko Schocher:
Hello,
I have problems with a lan9303 switch on an am335x based board, which does not support 1000FD/HD modes, but as it set BMSR_ERCAP bit in BMSR and returns 0xffff for reads on the MII_STAT1000 and MII_CTRL1000 registers, u-boot code detects SPEED_1000 in drivers/net/phy/phy.c genphy_parse_link() ... which is wrong, as this switch does not support 1000 modes ...
I found in ./common/miiphyutil.c miiphy_speed() the define CONFIG_PHY_GIGE which it seems lacks in drivers/net/phy/phy.c genphy_parse_link() ? Or is there another option?
Just an update ... the switch does not support reads for the registers 0x09 and 0x0a, but sets the BMSR_ERCAP bit in BMSR.
A phy_read on register 0x09 or 0x0a fails ... In my case the drivers/net/cpsw.c returns -1 ... and code in drivers/net/phy/phy.c:
int genphy_parse_link(struct phy_device *phydev) { int mii_reg = phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_BMSR);
/* We're using autonegotiation */ if (mii_reg & BMSR_ANEGCAPABLE) { u32 lpa = 0; u32 gblpa = 0; u32 estatus = 0;
/* Check for gigabit capability */ if (mii_reg & BMSR_ERCAP) { /* We want a list of states supported by * both PHYs in the link */ gblpa = phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_STAT1000); gblpa &= phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_CTRL1000) << 2; }
[...]
does not check, if phy_read returns with an error ...
Would this be an acceptable patch for it:
diff --git a/drivers/net/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/cpsw.c index 379b679..52c08ed 100644 --- a/drivers/net/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/cpsw.c @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static inline void wait_for_idle(void) static int cpsw_mdio_read(struct mii_dev *bus, int phy_id, int dev_addr, int phy_reg) { - unsigned short data; + int data; u32 reg;
if (phy_reg & ~PHY_REG_MASK || phy_id & ~PHY_ID_MASK) diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c index 7c0eaec..4522382 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ int genphy_parse_link(struct phy_device *phydev) /* We're using autonegotiation */ if (mii_reg & BMSR_ANEGCAPABLE) { u32 lpa = 0; - u32 gblpa = 0; + int gblpa = 0; u32 estatus = 0;
/* Check for gigabit capability */ @@ -300,6 +300,10 @@ int genphy_parse_link(struct phy_device *phydev) * both PHYs in the link */ gblpa = phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_STAT1000); + if (gblpa < 0) { + printf ("Could not read MII_STAT1000. Ignoring gigabit capability\n"); + gblpa = 0; + } gblpa &= phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_CTRL1000) << 2; } bye, Heiko

Dear Heiko,
In message 51DD3D92.8050701@denx.de you wrote:
Would this be an acceptable patch for it:
...
@@ -300,6 +300,10 @@ int genphy_parse_link(struct phy_device *phydev) * both PHYs in the link */ gblpa = phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_STAT1000);
if (gblpa < 0) {
printf ("Could not read MII_STAT1000. Ignoring gigabit capability\n");
gblpa = 0;
} gblpa &= phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_CTRL1000) << 2;
Well, this other phy_read() probably needs exactly the same error handling - and I doubt if we should actually try riding the reg when the first one failed already?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk

Hello Wolfgang,
Am 10.07.2013 13:15, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Heiko,
In message51DD3D92.8050701@denx.de you wrote:
Would this be an acceptable patch for it:
...
@@ -300,6 +300,10 @@ int genphy_parse_link(struct phy_device *phydev) * both PHYs in the link */ gblpa = phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_STAT1000);
if (gblpa< 0) {
printf ("Could not read MII_STAT1000. Ignoring gigabit capability\n");
gblpa = 0;
} gblpa&= phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_CTRL1000)<< 2;
Well, this other phy_read() probably needs exactly the same error handling - and I doubt if we should actually try riding the reg when the first one failed already?
Yes, you are right. The first question is, if such a patch is the right way for fixing it, or if there is a better way ...
bye, Heiko
participants (2)
-
Heiko Schocher
-
Wolfgang Denk