[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/1] ls102xa: Indexes of CSU slave is incorrect
In [1], we can see that the order of CSU slave indexes is a bit scrambled at the end. The ns_access.h file does not represent this ordering correctly. This patch aims to fix that.
[1]: http://www.nxp.com/products/microcontrollers-and-processors/arm-processors/q...
Vincent Siles (1): arm: Fix order of CSU indexes in ns_access.h
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ns_access.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
This patch aims to fix the order of CSU slave index for the LS1021a board.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Siles vincent.siles@provenrun.com
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ns_access.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ns_access.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ns_access.h index a921fb6..44acfd2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ns_access.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ns_access.h @@ -82,12 +82,12 @@ enum csu_cslx_ind { CSU_CSLX_FTM5, CSU_CSLX_FTM8, CSU_CSLX_FTM7, - CSU_CSLX_COP_DCSR, CSU_CSLX_EPU, - CSU_CSLX_GDI, + CSU_CSLX_COP_DCSR, CSU_CSLX_DDI, + CSU_CSLX_GDI, CSU_CSLX_RESERVED1, - CSU_CSLX_USB3_PHY = 117, + CSU_CSLX_USB3_PHY = 116, CSU_CSLX_RESERVED2, CSU_CSLX_MAX, };
On 03/29/2016 12:41 AM, Vincent Siles wrote:
This patch aims to fix the order of CSU slave index for the LS1021a board.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Siles vincent.siles@provenrun.com
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ns_access.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Revised tag in subject. Applied to u-boot-fsl-qoriq master. Awaiting upstream. Thanks.
York
participants (2)
-
Vincent Siles -
York Sun