[U-Boot] [PATCH] Kirkwood: bugfix: DRAM size initialization

If start of any DRAM bank is greater than total DDR size, remaining DDR bank sizes were left un-initialized in dram_init function. This could break other functions who uses array 'gd->bd->bi_dram'.Kirkwood network driver is one example.
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Upadhyay tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c index 7439c87..cb396d1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c @@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ int dram_init(void) gd->ram_size += gd->bd->bi_dram[i].size;
} + + for (; i < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; i++) { + /* If above loop terminated prematurely, we need to set + * remaining bank sizes as 0 */ + gd->bd->bi_dram[i].size = 0; + } + return 0; }

Do we want them set to zero regardless of their size, or do we just want to not include the further banks in gd->ram_size. Signed-off-by: Gray Remlin g_remlin@rocketmail.com diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c index 7439c87..3f5eae5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c @@ -75,10 +75,8 @@ int dram_init(void) * If the gap is found, ram_size will be reported for * consecutive memory only */ - if (gd->bd->bi_dram[i].start != gd->ram_size) - break; - - gd->ram_size += gd->bd->bi_dram[i].size; + if (gd->bd->bi_dram[i].start == gd->ram_size) + gd->ram_size += gd->bd->bi_dram[i].size;
} return 0;

Hi All,
I was a bit hasty in providing the patch. Given patch solves u-boot stuff, but Linux kernel still has some trouble. I am providing second version of this patch which takes care of start address also. This fixes Linux kernel issue.
Please ignore this version.
Sorry,
Tanmay
On 10/14/2010 06:17 PM, Tanmay Upadhyay wrote:
If start of any DRAM bank is greater than total DDR size, remaining DDR bank sizes were left un-initialized in dram_init function. This could break other functions who uses array 'gd->bd->bi_dram'.Kirkwood network driver is one example.
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Upadhyaytanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c index 7439c87..cb396d1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c @@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ int dram_init(void) gd->ram_size += gd->bd->bi_dram[i].size;
}
- for (; i< CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; i++) {
/* If above loop terminated prematurely, we need to set
* remaining bank sizes as 0 */
gd->bd->bi_dram[i].size = 0;
- }
- return 0; }
participants (2)
-
g_remlin
-
Tanmay Upadhyay