[U-Boot-Users] A question on ELDK PATH Setting
Hi all,
I found the cross_compiling tool path setting of ELDK can be concise further. We could just set PATH=$PATH:/opt/eldk/usr/bin RATHER THAN PATH=$PATH:/opt/eldk/usr/bin:/opt/eldk/bin
At least, the shorter setting work for me well to compile 2.4 or 2.6 kernel. Is it OK for other possible cases or any other cases still need to keep the setting?
Thanks,
Sam
_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 150万曲MP3疯狂搜，带您闯入音乐殿堂 http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/yisou/music/*http://music.yisou.com/ 美女明星应有尽有，搜遍美图、艳图和酷图 http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/yisou/image/*http://image.yisou.com 1G就是1000兆，雅虎电邮自助扩容！ http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/1g/*http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/event/mail_1...
In message 20050424053255.59580.qmail@web15908.mail.cnb.yahoo.com you wrote:
I found the cross_compiling tool path setting of ELDK can be concise further. We could just set PATH=$PATH:/opt/eldk/usr/bin RATHER THAN PATH=$PATH:/opt/eldk/usr/bin:/opt/eldk/bin
If you have a look at the contrents of the ELDK's bin directories you will see that you will be missing the ${CROSS_COMPILE}rpm tool if you omit the /opt/eldk/bin directory from your PATH. It doends on what you're doing if you need this or not.
But actually this is completely off topic here...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
participants (2)
-
Sam Song -
Wolfgang Denk