[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ATMEL/PIO: Enable new feature of PIO on Atmel device
v2: Remove legacy interface.
v1: Enable new PIO feature supported by Atmel SoC. Using CPU_HAS_PIO3 micro to enable PIO new feature.
Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.shen@atmel.com --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h | 78 ++++++++++-------- drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h index 416cabf..0ec2dca 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h @@ -66,14 +66,50 @@ typedef struct at91_port { u32 puer; /* 0x64 Pull-up Enable Register */ u32 pusr; /* 0x68 Pad Pull-up Status Register */ u32 reserved4; +#if defined(CPU_HAS_PIO3) + u32 abcdsr1; /* 0x70 Peripheral ABCD Select Register 1 */ + u32 abcdsr2; /* 0x74 Peripheral ABCD Select Register 2 */ + u32 reserved5[2]; + u32 ifscdr; /* 0x80 Input Filter SCLK Disable Register */ + u32 ifscer; /* 0x84 Input Filter SCLK Enable Register */ + u32 ifscsr; /* 0x88 Input Filter SCLK Status Register */ + u32 scdr; /* 0x8C SCLK Divider Debouncing Register */ + u32 ppddr; /* 0x90 Pad Pull-down Disable Register */ + u32 ppder; /* 0x94 Pad Pull-down Enable Register */ + u32 ppdsr; /* 0x98 Pad Pull-down Status Register */ + u32 reserved6; /* */ +#else u32 asr; /* 0x70 Select A Register */ u32 bsr; /* 0x74 Select B Register */ u32 absr; /* 0x78 AB Select Status Register */ u32 reserved5[9]; /* */ +#endif u32 ower; /* 0xA0 Output Write Enable Register */ u32 owdr; /* 0xA4 Output Write Disable Register */ - u32 owsr; /* OxA8 utput Write Status Register */ + u32 owsr; /* OxA8 Output Write Status Register */ +#if defined(CPU_HAS_PIO3) + u32 reserved7; /* */ + u32 aimer; /* 0xB0 Additional INT Modes Enable Register */ + u32 aimdr; /* 0xB4 Additional INT Modes Disable Register */ + u32 aimmr; /* 0xB8 Additional INT Modes Mask Register */ + u32 reserved8; /* */ + u32 esr; /* 0xC0 Edge Select Register */ + u32 lsr; /* 0xC4 Level Select Register */ + u32 elsr; /* 0xC8 Edge/Level Status Register */ + u32 reserved9; /* 0xCC */ + u32 fellsr; /* 0xD0 Falling /Low Level Select Register */ + u32 rehlsr; /* 0xD4 Rising /High Level Select Register */ + u32 frlhsr; /* 0xD8 Fall/Rise - Low/High Status Register */ + u32 reserved10; /* */ + u32 locksr; /* 0xE0 Lock Status */ + u32 wpmr; /* 0xE4 Write Protect Mode Register */ + u32 wpsr; /* 0xE8 Write Protect Status Register */ + u32 reserved11[5]; /* */ + u32 schmitt; /* 0x100 Schmitt Trigger Register */ + u32 reserved12[63]; +#else u32 reserved6[85]; +#endif } at91_port_t;
typedef union at91_pio { @@ -94,6 +130,13 @@ typedef union at91_pio { #ifdef CONFIG_AT91_GPIO int at91_set_a_periph(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int use_pullup); int at91_set_b_periph(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int use_pullup); +#if defined(CPU_HAS_PIO3) +int at91_set_c_periph(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int use_pullup); +int at91_set_d_periph(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int use_pullup); +int at91_set_pio_debounce(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int is_on, int div); +int at91_set_pio_pulldown(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int is_on); +int at91_set_pio_disable_schmitt_trig(unsigned port, unsigned pin); +#endif int at91_set_pio_input(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int use_pullup); int at91_set_pio_multi_drive(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int is_on); int at91_set_pio_output(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int value); @@ -111,37 +154,4 @@ int at91_get_pio_value(unsigned port, unsigned pin); #define AT91_PIO_PORTD 0x3 #define AT91_PIO_PORTE 0x4
-#ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY - -#define PIO_PER 0x00 /* Enable Register */ -#define PIO_PDR 0x04 /* Disable Register */ -#define PIO_PSR 0x08 /* Status Register */ -#define PIO_OER 0x10 /* Output Enable Register */ -#define PIO_ODR 0x14 /* Output Disable Register */ -#define PIO_OSR 0x18 /* Output Status Register */ -#define PIO_IFER 0x20 /* Glitch Input Filter Enable */ -#define PIO_IFDR 0x24 /* Glitch Input Filter Disable */ -#define PIO_IFSR 0x28 /* Glitch Input Filter Status */ -#define PIO_SODR 0x30 /* Set Output Data Register */ -#define PIO_CODR 0x34 /* Clear Output Data Register */ -#define PIO_ODSR 0x38 /* Output Data Status Register */ -#define PIO_PDSR 0x3c /* Pin Data Status Register */ -#define PIO_IER 0x40 /* Interrupt Enable Register */ -#define PIO_IDR 0x44 /* Interrupt Disable Register */ -#define PIO_IMR 0x48 /* Interrupt Mask Register */ -#define PIO_ISR 0x4c /* Interrupt Status Register */ -#define PIO_MDER 0x50 /* Multi-driver Enable Register */ -#define PIO_MDDR 0x54 /* Multi-driver Disable Register */ -#define PIO_MDSR 0x58 /* Multi-driver Status Register */ -#define PIO_PUDR 0x60 /* Pull-up Disable Register */ -#define PIO_PUER 0x64 /* Pull-up Enable Register */ -#define PIO_PUSR 0x68 /* Pull-up Status Register */ -#define PIO_ASR 0x70 /* Peripheral A Select Register */ -#define PIO_BSR 0x74 /* Peripheral B Select Register */ -#define PIO_ABSR 0x78 /* AB Status Register */ -#define PIO_OWER 0xa0 /* Output Write Enable Register */ -#define PIO_OWDR 0xa4 /* Output Write Disable Register */ -#define PIO_OWSR 0xa8 /* Output Write Status Register */ -#endif - #endif diff --git a/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c index be2a026..ac3b322 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c @@ -86,7 +86,14 @@ int at91_set_a_periph(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int use_pullup) mask = 1 << pin; writel(mask, &pio->port[port].idr); at91_set_pio_pullup(port, pin, use_pullup); +#if defined(CPU_HAS_PIO3) + writel(readl(&pio->port[port].abcdsr1) & ~mask, + &pio->port[port].abcdsr1); + writel(readl(&pio->port[port].abcdsr2) & ~mask, + &pio->port[port].abcdsr2); +#else writel(mask, &pio->port[port].asr); +#endif writel(mask, &pio->port[port].pdr); } return 0; @@ -104,12 +111,63 @@ int at91_set_b_periph(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int use_pullup) mask = 1 << pin; writel(mask, &pio->port[port].idr); at91_set_pio_pullup(port, pin, use_pullup); +#if defined(CPU_HAS_PIO3) + writel(readl(&pio->port[port].abcdsr1) | mask, + &pio->port[port].abcdsr1); + writel(readl(&pio->port[port].abcdsr2) & ~mask, + &pio->port[port].abcdsr2); +#else writel(mask, &pio->port[port].bsr); +#endif writel(mask, &pio->port[port].pdr); } return 0; }
+#if defined(CPU_HAS_PIO3) +/* + * mux the pin to the "C" internal peripheral role. + */ +int at91_set_c_periph(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int use_pullup) +{ + at91_pio_t *pio = (at91_pio_t *) ATMEL_BASE_PIOA; + u32 mask; + + if ((port < ATMEL_PIO_PORTS) && (pin < 32)) { + mask = 1 << pin; + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].idr); + at91_set_pio_pullup(port, pin, use_pullup); + writel(readl(&pio->port[port].abcdsr1) & ~mask, + &pio->port[port].abcdsr1); + writel(readl(&pio->port[port].abcdsr2) | mask, + &pio->port[port].abcdsr2); + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].pdr); + } + return 0; +} + +/* + * mux the pin to the "D" internal peripheral role. + */ +int at91_set_d_periph(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int use_pullup) +{ + at91_pio_t *pio = (at91_pio_t *) ATMEL_BASE_PIOA; + u32 mask; + + if ((port < ATMEL_PIO_PORTS) && (pin < 32)) { + mask = 1 << pin; + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].idr); + at91_set_pio_pullup(port, pin, use_pullup); + writel(readl(&pio->port[port].abcdsr1) | mask, + &pio->port[port].abcdsr1); + writel(readl(&pio->port[port].abcdsr2) | mask, + &pio->port[port].abcdsr2); + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].pdr); + } + return 0; +} +#endif + /* * mux the pin to the gpio controller (instead of "A" or "B" peripheral), and * configure it for an input. @@ -162,13 +220,76 @@ int at91_set_pio_deglitch(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int is_on)
if ((port < ATMEL_PIO_PORTS) && (pin < 32)) { mask = 1 << pin; - if (is_on) + if (is_on) { +#if defined(CPU_HAS_PIO3) + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].ifscdr); +#endif writel(mask, &pio->port[port].ifer); - else + } else { writel(mask, &pio->port[port].ifdr); + } + } + return 0; +} + +#if defined(CPU_HAS_PIO3) +/* + * enable/disable the debounce filter. + */ +int at91_set_pio_debounce(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int is_on, int div) +{ + at91_pio_t *pio = (at91_pio_t *) ATMEL_BASE_PIOA; + u32 mask; + + if ((port < ATMEL_PIO_PORTS) && (pin < 32)) { + mask = 1 << pin; + if (is_on) { + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].ifscer); + writel(div & PIO_SCDR_DIV, &pio->port[port].scdr); + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].ifer); + } else { + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].ifdr); + } + } + return 0; +} + +/* + * enable/disable the pull-down. + * If pull-up already enabled while calling the function, we disable it. + */ +int at91_set_pio_pulldown(unsigned port, unsigned pin, int is_on) +{ + at91_pio_t *pio = (at91_pio_t *) ATMEL_BASE_PIOA; + u32 mask; + + if ((port < ATMEL_PIO_PORTS) && (pin < 32)) { + mask = 1 << pin; + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].pudr); + if (is_on) + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].ppder); + else + writel(mask, &pio->port[port].ppddr); + } + return 0; +} + +/* + * disable Schmitt trigger + */ +int at91_set_pio_disable_schmitt_trig(unsigned port, unsigned pin) +{ + at91_pio_t *pio = (at91_pio_t *) ATMEL_BASE_PIOA; + u32 mask; + + if ((port < ATMEL_PIO_PORTS) && (pin < 32)) { + mask = 1 << pin; + writel(readl(&pio->port[port].schmitt) | mask, + &pio->port[port].schmitt); } return 0; } +#endif
/* * enable/disable the multi-driver. This is only valid for output and
Dear Bo Shen,
On 16.05.2012 04:16, Bo Shen wrote:
v2: Remove legacy interface.
v1: Enable new PIO feature supported by Atmel SoC. Using CPU_HAS_PIO3 micro to enable PIO new feature.
these go behind the '---' line. All before the '---' will be the git commit message. The git commit message should not contain the history!
Please read http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches for that.
Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.shen@atmel.com
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h | 78 ++++++++++-------- drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h index 416cabf..0ec2dca 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h
<snip new interface>
new interface looks good so far, but seems there are no users currently (will there new at91 devices coming soon?)
-#ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY
-#define PIO_PER 0x00 /* Enable Register */ -#define PIO_PDR 0x04 /* Disable Register */ -#define PIO_PSR 0x08 /* Status Register */ -#define PIO_OER 0x10 /* Output Enable Register */ -#define PIO_ODR 0x14 /* Output Disable Register */ -#define PIO_OSR 0x18 /* Output Status Register */ -#define PIO_IFER 0x20 /* Glitch Input Filter Enable */ -#define PIO_IFDR 0x24 /* Glitch Input Filter Disable */ -#define PIO_IFSR 0x28 /* Glitch Input Filter Status */ -#define PIO_SODR 0x30 /* Set Output Data Register */ -#define PIO_CODR 0x34 /* Clear Output Data Register */ -#define PIO_ODSR 0x38 /* Output Data Status Register */ -#define PIO_PDSR 0x3c /* Pin Data Status Register */ -#define PIO_IER 0x40 /* Interrupt Enable Register */ -#define PIO_IDR 0x44 /* Interrupt Disable Register */ -#define PIO_IMR 0x48 /* Interrupt Mask Register */ -#define PIO_ISR 0x4c /* Interrupt Status Register */ -#define PIO_MDER 0x50 /* Multi-driver Enable Register */ -#define PIO_MDDR 0x54 /* Multi-driver Disable Register */ -#define PIO_MDSR 0x58 /* Multi-driver Status Register */ -#define PIO_PUDR 0x60 /* Pull-up Disable Register */ -#define PIO_PUER 0x64 /* Pull-up Enable Register */ -#define PIO_PUSR 0x68 /* Pull-up Status Register */ -#define PIO_ASR 0x70 /* Peripheral A Select Register */ -#define PIO_BSR 0x74 /* Peripheral B Select Register */ -#define PIO_ABSR 0x78 /* AB Status Register */ -#define PIO_OWER 0xa0 /* Output Write Enable Register */ -#define PIO_OWDR 0xa4 /* Output Write Disable Register */ -#define PIO_OWSR 0xa8 /* Output Write Status Register */ -#endif
I think this should be done in a separate patch (series). There are a lot of CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY left somewhere in the code. Please read doc/README.at91-soc; I think step 4 is reached so step 5 should follow.
For this patch I think it would be best to not touch these definitions at all. A second patch (series) fulfilling step 5 in doc/README.at91-soc would be great ;)
best regards
Andreas Bießmann
On 5/16/2012 18:42, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Bo Shen,
On 16.05.2012 04:16, Bo Shen wrote:
v2: Remove legacy interface.
v1: Enable new PIO feature supported by Atmel SoC. Using CPU_HAS_PIO3 micro to enable PIO new feature.
these go behind the '---' line. All before the '---' will be the git commit message. The git commit message should not contain the history!
Please read http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches for that.
OK. Thanks
Signed-off-by: Bo Shenvoice.shen@atmel.com
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h | 78 ++++++++++-------- drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h index 416cabf..0ec2dca 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h
<snip new interface>
new interface looks good so far, but seems there are no users currently (will there new at91 devices coming soon?)
Yes. I plan to submit new at91 devices at following days.
-#ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY
-#define PIO_PER 0x00 /* Enable Register */ -#define PIO_PDR 0x04 /* Disable Register */ -#define PIO_PSR 0x08 /* Status Register */ -#define PIO_OER 0x10 /* Output Enable Register */ -#define PIO_ODR 0x14 /* Output Disable Register */ -#define PIO_OSR 0x18 /* Output Status Register */ -#define PIO_IFER 0x20 /* Glitch Input Filter Enable */ -#define PIO_IFDR 0x24 /* Glitch Input Filter Disable */ -#define PIO_IFSR 0x28 /* Glitch Input Filter Status */ -#define PIO_SODR 0x30 /* Set Output Data Register */ -#define PIO_CODR 0x34 /* Clear Output Data Register */ -#define PIO_ODSR 0x38 /* Output Data Status Register */ -#define PIO_PDSR 0x3c /* Pin Data Status Register */ -#define PIO_IER 0x40 /* Interrupt Enable Register */ -#define PIO_IDR 0x44 /* Interrupt Disable Register */ -#define PIO_IMR 0x48 /* Interrupt Mask Register */ -#define PIO_ISR 0x4c /* Interrupt Status Register */ -#define PIO_MDER 0x50 /* Multi-driver Enable Register */ -#define PIO_MDDR 0x54 /* Multi-driver Disable Register */ -#define PIO_MDSR 0x58 /* Multi-driver Status Register */ -#define PIO_PUDR 0x60 /* Pull-up Disable Register */ -#define PIO_PUER 0x64 /* Pull-up Enable Register */ -#define PIO_PUSR 0x68 /* Pull-up Status Register */ -#define PIO_ASR 0x70 /* Peripheral A Select Register */ -#define PIO_BSR 0x74 /* Peripheral B Select Register */ -#define PIO_ABSR 0x78 /* AB Status Register */ -#define PIO_OWER 0xa0 /* Output Write Enable Register */ -#define PIO_OWDR 0xa4 /* Output Write Disable Register */ -#define PIO_OWSR 0xa8 /* Output Write Status Register */ -#endif
I think this should be done in a separate patch (series). There are a lot of CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY left somewhere in the code. Please read doc/README.at91-soc; I think step 4 is reached so step 5 should follow.
Would this be dealt one by one, while not a series?
For this patch I think it would be best to not touch these definitions at all. A second patch (series) fulfilling step 5 in doc/README.at91-soc would be great ;)
best regards
Andreas Bießmann
Dear Bo Shen,
On 17.05.2012 03:19, Bo Shen wrote:
On 5/16/2012 18:42, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Bo Shen,
On 16.05.2012 04:16, Bo Shen wrote:
<snip>
-#ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY
<snip remove of legacy interface>
I think this should be done in a separate patch (series). There are a lot of CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY left somewhere in the code. Please read doc/README.at91-soc; I think step 4 is reached so step 5 should follow.
Would this be dealt one by one, while not a series?
Well it must not be a series of patches send at once. This can also be done step by step e.g. by first cleaning up atmel_pio and doing other parts later (I think this should/could be documented in the doc/README.at91-soc). This should be carefully considered because you may break some boards. Beware! I do not really know if my statement 'step 4 of doc/README.at91-soc is reached' is correct, so this needs to be proven. If you have proven that removing legacy interface of atmel_pio is ok, I would like to see another patch for that task (this patch is 'Enable new feature ..' not 'remove legacy interface ..').
Some additional words on this part of the patch. I think (and this is my personal view) we should not expand legacy interfaces at all, instead we should try to remove them sooner rather than later. Additionally I think (again my personal view) it is not your responsibility to clean this up _now_ because you touch this file. In my opinion it is ok to just add the new interface and leave the old one as is.
Maybe someone else (Albert?) can comment on this?
best regards
Andreas Bießmann
Hi Andreas,
On 5/18/2012 19:01, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Bo Shen,
On 17.05.2012 03:19, Bo Shen wrote:
On 5/16/2012 18:42, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Bo Shen,
On 16.05.2012 04:16, Bo Shen wrote:
<snip>
-#ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY
<snip remove of legacy interface>
I think this should be done in a separate patch (series). There are a lot of CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY left somewhere in the code. Please read doc/README.at91-soc; I think step 4 is reached so step 5 should follow.
Would this be dealt one by one, while not a series?
Well it must not be a series of patches send at once. This can also be done step by step e.g. by first cleaning up atmel_pio and doing other parts later (I think this should/could be documented in the doc/README.at91-soc). This should be carefully considered because you may break some boards. Beware! I do not really know if my statement 'step 4 of doc/README.at91-soc is reached' is correct, so this needs to be proven. If you have proven that removing legacy interface of atmel_pio is ok, I would like to see another patch for that task (this patch is 'Enable new feature ..' not 'remove legacy interface ..').
I will take this suggestion. Just add the new feature and do not touch with the legacy interface. The version 3 has been sent out.
Some additional words on this part of the patch. I think (and this is my personal view) we should not expand legacy interfaces at all, instead we should try to remove them sooner rather than later. Additionally I think (again my personal view) it is not your responsibility to clean this up _now_ because you touch this file. In my opinion it is ok to just add the new interface and leave the old one as is.
Maybe someone else (Albert?) can comment on this?
best regards
Andreas Bießmann
participants (2)
-
Andreas Bießmann -
Bo Shen