[PATCH] mmc: rockchip_sdhci: Use bounce buffer in SPL to fix read performance

The commit 3b804b370dd8 ("mmc: rockchip_sdhci: Disable DMA mode using a device tree property") and commit 2cc6cde647e2 ("mmc: rockchip_sdhci: Limit number of blocks read in a single command") implemented a workaround to fix loading a part of TF-A into SRAM from eMMC in SPL.
This has resulted in very slow read performance of FIT from eMMC in SPL on RK3588.
Change to make use of a bounce buffer to significantly improve the read performance when malloc_limit is large enough and use PIO mode as fall back.
Also update the size of align_buffer to use SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE instead of a hardcoded 512 * 1024.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman jonas@kwiboo.se --- - This has been tested on RK3588 boards with malloc_limit above 512 KiB and on RK3399 boards with less than 512 KiB malloc_limit. - Together with HS200 mode [1] and D-cache [2] enabled in SPL loading of FIT can be very fast on RK3588.
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1895043/ [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1891025/ --- drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- drivers/mmc/sdhci.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c index 706fb1235796..528544b1eff8 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ #include <syscon.h> #include <asm/arch-rockchip/clock.h> #include <asm/arch-rockchip/hardware.h> +#include <asm/global_data.h> + +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
/* DWCMSHC specific Mode Select value */ #define DWCMSHC_CTRL_HS400 0x7 @@ -591,12 +594,21 @@ static int rockchip_sdhci_probe(struct udevice *dev) return ret;
/* - * Disable use of DMA and force use of PIO mode in SPL to fix an issue - * where loading part of TF-A into SRAM using DMA silently fails. + * Use a bounce buffer or PIO mode in SPL to fix an issue where loading + * part of TF-A directly into SRAM using DMA silently fails. */ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && - dev_read_bool(dev, "u-boot,spl-fifo-mode")) - host->flags &= ~USE_DMA; + dev_read_bool(dev, "u-boot,spl-fifo-mode")) { + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_MALLOC_F) && + gd->malloc_limit > SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE) { + cfg->b_max = SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE / + MMC_MAX_BLOCK_LEN; + host->force_align_buffer = true; + host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR; + } else { + host->flags &= ~USE_DMA; + } + }
/* * Reading more than 4 blocks with a single CMD18 command in PIO mode diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c index 0178ed8a11e1..cc855dc7ba3d 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int sdhci_init(struct mmc *mmc) host->force_align_buffer = true; #else if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR) { - host->align_buffer = memalign(8, 512 * 1024); + host->align_buffer = memalign(8, SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE); if (!host->align_buffer) { printf("%s: Aligned buffer alloc failed!!!\n", __func__);

Hi all,
Please ignore this patch for now.
Reading more than 4 blocks with a single CMD18 command in PIO mode seem to work much better after the HS200 mode series [1] together with a fix so that the stack and simple malloc heap does not overlap.
I will send a different patch in next few days.
Regards, Jonas
On 2024-02-05 19:27, Jonas Karlman wrote:
The commit 3b804b370dd8 ("mmc: rockchip_sdhci: Disable DMA mode using a device tree property") and commit 2cc6cde647e2 ("mmc: rockchip_sdhci: Limit number of blocks read in a single command") implemented a workaround to fix loading a part of TF-A into SRAM from eMMC in SPL.
This has resulted in very slow read performance of FIT from eMMC in SPL on RK3588.
Change to make use of a bounce buffer to significantly improve the read performance when malloc_limit is large enough and use PIO mode as fall back.
Also update the size of align_buffer to use SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE instead of a hardcoded 512 * 1024.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman jonas@kwiboo.se
- This has been tested on RK3588 boards with malloc_limit above 512 KiB and on RK3399 boards with less than 512 KiB malloc_limit.
- Together with HS200 mode [1] and D-cache [2] enabled in SPL loading of FIT can be very fast on RK3588.
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1895043/ [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1891025/
drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- drivers/mmc/sdhci.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c index 706fb1235796..528544b1eff8 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/rockchip_sdhci.c @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ #include <syscon.h> #include <asm/arch-rockchip/clock.h> #include <asm/arch-rockchip/hardware.h> +#include <asm/global_data.h>
+DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
/* DWCMSHC specific Mode Select value */ #define DWCMSHC_CTRL_HS400 0x7 @@ -591,12 +594,21 @@ static int rockchip_sdhci_probe(struct udevice *dev) return ret;
/*
* Disable use of DMA and force use of PIO mode in SPL to fix an issue
* where loading part of TF-A into SRAM using DMA silently fails.
* Use a bounce buffer or PIO mode in SPL to fix an issue where loading
*/ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) &&* part of TF-A directly into SRAM using DMA silently fails.
dev_read_bool(dev, "u-boot,spl-fifo-mode"))
host->flags &= ~USE_DMA;
dev_read_bool(dev, "u-boot,spl-fifo-mode")) {
if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_MALLOC_F) &&
gd->malloc_limit > SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE) {
cfg->b_max = SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE /
MMC_MAX_BLOCK_LEN;
host->force_align_buffer = true;
host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR;
} else {
host->flags &= ~USE_DMA;
}
}
/*
- Reading more than 4 blocks with a single CMD18 command in PIO mode
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c index 0178ed8a11e1..cc855dc7ba3d 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int sdhci_init(struct mmc *mmc) host->force_align_buffer = true; #else if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR) {
host->align_buffer = memalign(8, 512 * 1024);
if (!host->align_buffer) { printf("%s: Aligned buffer alloc failed!!!\n", __func__);host->align_buffer = memalign(8, SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE);
participants (1)
-
Jonas Karlman