[U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?
Hi,
It looks like sparc has no maintainer and has not been converted to generic board. Should we remove it?
Regards, Simon
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 06:19:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
It looks like sparc has no maintainer and has not been converted to generic board. Should we remove it?
Well, not quite "no maintainer", but... Daniel? SPARC is in need of some work (and possibly a new toolchain too, I stopped building it all the time due to a false positive warning the 3.4.4 toolchain I have gives). Thanks!
(+CC Francois)
2015-10-18 21:24 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 06:19:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
It looks like sparc has no maintainer and has not been converted to generic board. Should we remove it?
Well, not quite "no maintainer", but... Daniel? SPARC is in need of some work (and possibly a new toolchain too, I stopped building it all the time due to a false positive warning the 3.4.4 toolchain I have gives). Thanks!
-- Tom
I see generic board work for SPARC
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404616/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404618/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404617/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404619/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404620/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404622/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404621/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404624/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404623/
but, Daniel was not responding...
Perhaps, replace the maintainer if Francois agrees?
On 10/18/2015 05:20 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
(+CC Francois)
2015-10-18 21:24 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 06:19:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
It looks like sparc has no maintainer and has not been converted to generic board. Should we remove it?
Well, not quite "no maintainer", but... Daniel? SPARC is in need of some work (and possibly a new toolchain too, I stopped building it all the time due to a false positive warning the 3.4.4 toolchain I have gives). Thanks!
-- Tom
I see generic board work for SPARC
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404616/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404618/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404617/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404619/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404620/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404622/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404621/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404624/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404623/
but, Daniel was not responding...
Perhaps, replace the maintainer if Francois agrees?
I regret to say that I've been too busy last two years and I don't see a change during 2015 either.
I would not like to see the SPARC port removed now that the LEON community grows as new LEON3 and LEON4 chips comes to market. WIth multi-core and higher frequency there is a growing interest in u-boot from the LEON community.
Nowadays there are LEON GCC targets mcpu=leon,leon3,leon3v7 so it should be possible to setup a working toolchain based on GCC-4.9 which we use for Linux and RTEMS. In the past I've used a GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
If Francois agrees it is probably a good idea to let him take over the SPARC as he has put work into both BSP and architecture. Although I would like to acknowledge my interest in u-boot and I hope and believe that my efforts will be resumed in the future. Francois, if you feel it is too much a temporary replacement could also be an option if the u-boot project allows it.
Best Regards, Daniel Hellstrom
Hallo Daniel,
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Hellstrom [mailto:daniel@gaisler.com] Sent: 18 October 2015 11:30 PM To: Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?
On 10/18/2015 05:20 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
(+CC Francois)
2015-10-18 21:24 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 06:19:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
It looks like sparc has no maintainer and has not been converted to generic board. Should we remove it?
Well, not quite "no maintainer", but... Daniel? SPARC is in need of some work (and possibly a new toolchain too, I stopped building it all the time due to a false positive warning the 3.4.4 toolchain I have gives). Thanks!
-- Tom
I see generic board work for SPARC
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404616/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404618/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404617/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404619/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404620/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404622/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404621/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404624/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404623/
but, Daniel was not responding...
Perhaps, replace the maintainer if Francois agrees?
I regret to say that I've been too busy last two years and I don't see a change during 2015 either.
I would not like to see the SPARC port removed now that the LEON community grows as new LEON3 and LEON4 chips comes to market. WIth multi-core and higher frequency there is a growing interest in u-boot from the LEON community.
Nowadays there are LEON GCC targets mcpu=leon,leon3,leon3v7 so it should be possible to setup a working toolchain based on GCC-4.9 which we use for Linux and RTEMS. In the past I've used a GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
If Francois agrees it is probably a good idea to let him take over the SPARC as he has put work into both BSP and architecture. Although I would like to acknowledge my interest in u-boot and I hope and believe that my efforts will be resumed in the future. Francois, if you feel it is too much a temporary replacement could also be an option if the u-boot project allows it.
Yes, I am willing to take over as maintainer until such time that Daniel is ready to resume his effort in future. We are investing in the LEON as archtecture and would like to see U-Boot support for SPARC continuing into the future.
Daniel, I would just like to ask if you could stay on as an advisor, if at all possible. I have only access to one LEON3FT board at the moment and may require advice on other devices as time goes by. I will try to keep questions consise and as infrequent as possible for you.
Will rebase my patch set to the latest release this week and resend them for review. Masahiro, what version of GCC is prefered (if any) for the next release of U-Boot. I am currently using the GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
Regards, Francois
________________________________ Disclaimer and confidentiality note – refer to our website for further details: www.spaceteq.co.za http://www.spaceteq.co.za/home/emaildisclaimer/
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:54:57PM +0000, Francois Retief wrote:
Hallo Daniel,
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Hellstrom [mailto:daniel@gaisler.com] Sent: 18 October 2015 11:30 PM To: Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?
On 10/18/2015 05:20 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
(+CC Francois)
2015-10-18 21:24 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 06:19:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
It looks like sparc has no maintainer and has not been converted to generic board. Should we remove it?
Well, not quite "no maintainer", but... Daniel? SPARC is in need of some work (and possibly a new toolchain too, I stopped building it all the time due to a false positive warning the 3.4.4 toolchain I have gives). Thanks!
-- Tom
I see generic board work for SPARC
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404616/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404618/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404617/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404619/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404620/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404622/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404621/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404624/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404623/
but, Daniel was not responding...
Perhaps, replace the maintainer if Francois agrees?
I regret to say that I've been too busy last two years and I don't see a change during 2015 either.
I would not like to see the SPARC port removed now that the LEON community grows as new LEON3 and LEON4 chips comes to market. WIth multi-core and higher frequency there is a growing interest in u-boot from the LEON community.
Nowadays there are LEON GCC targets mcpu=leon,leon3,leon3v7 so it should be possible to setup a working toolchain based on GCC-4.9 which we use for Linux and RTEMS. In the past I've used a GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
If Francois agrees it is probably a good idea to let him take over the SPARC as he has put work into both BSP and architecture. Although I would like to acknowledge my interest in u-boot and I hope and believe that my efforts will be resumed in the future. Francois, if you feel it is too much a temporary replacement could also be an option if the u-boot project allows it.
Yes, I am willing to take over as maintainer until such time that Daniel is ready to resume his effort in future. We are investing in the LEON as archtecture and would like to see U-Boot support for SPARC continuing into the future.
Daniel, I would just like to ask if you could stay on as an advisor, if at all possible. I have only access to one LEON3FT board at the moment and may require advice on other devices as time goes by. I will try to keep questions consise and as infrequent as possible for you.
Will rebase my patch set to the latest release this week and resend them for review. Masahiro, what version of GCC is prefered (if any) for the next release of U-Boot. I am currently using the GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
Any semi-modern toolchain is fine with me. Can you point me at the 4.4 toolchain and I'll put sparc back into my build-test cycle? Thanks!
-----Original Message----- From: Tom Rini [mailto:trini@konsulko.com] Sent: 19 October 2015 05:47 PM To: Francois Retief fgretief@spaceteq.co.za Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:54:57PM +0000, Francois Retief wrote:
Hallo Daniel,
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Hellstrom [mailto:daniel@gaisler.com] Sent: 18 October 2015 11:30 PM To: Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?
...
Nowadays there are LEON GCC targets mcpu=leon,leon3,leon3v7 so it
should
be possible to setup a working toolchain based on GCC-4.9 which we use for Linux and RTEMS. In the past I've used a GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
...
Will rebase my patch set to the latest release this week and resend them
for review.
Masahiro, what version of GCC is prefered (if any) for the next release of
U-Boot.
I am currently using the GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
Any semi-modern toolchain is fine with me. Can you point me at the 4.4 toolchain and I'll put sparc back into my build-test cycle? Thanks!
I have been using this compiler up to now: http://www.gaisler.com/anonftp/bcc/bin/linux/sparc-elf-4.4.2-1.0.44.tar.bz2
Daniel is that the one you have been refering to?
Regards, Francois
________________________________ Disclaimer and confidentiality note – refer to our website for further details: www.spaceteq.co.za http://www.spaceteq.co.za/home/emaildisclaimer/
Dear Francois,
In message 444fa87bd0f644b0a6027f7bb5a5f34a@SPASTBMXS01.sunspace.co.za you wrote:
Yes, I am willing to take over as maintainer until such time that Daniel is ready to resume his effort in future. We are investing in the LEON as archtecture and would like to see U-Boot support for SPARC continuing into the future.
Then please send me your SSH public key, so I can enable write access to the SPARC repo for you.
Thanks, and welcome aboard!
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
2015-10-19 23:54 GMT+09:00 Francois Retief fgretief@spaceteq.co.za:
Hallo Daniel,
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Hellstrom [mailto:daniel@gaisler.com] Sent: 18 October 2015 11:30 PM To: Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?
On 10/18/2015 05:20 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
(+CC Francois)
2015-10-18 21:24 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 06:19:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
It looks like sparc has no maintainer and has not been converted to generic board. Should we remove it?
Well, not quite "no maintainer", but... Daniel? SPARC is in need of some work (and possibly a new toolchain too, I stopped building it all the time due to a false positive warning the 3.4.4 toolchain I have gives). Thanks!
-- Tom
I see generic board work for SPARC
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404616/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404618/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404617/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404619/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404620/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404622/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404621/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404624/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404623/
but, Daniel was not responding...
Perhaps, replace the maintainer if Francois agrees?
I regret to say that I've been too busy last two years and I don't see a change during 2015 either.
I would not like to see the SPARC port removed now that the LEON community grows as new LEON3 and LEON4 chips comes to market. WIth multi-core and higher frequency there is a growing interest in u-boot from the LEON community.
Nowadays there are LEON GCC targets mcpu=leon,leon3,leon3v7 so it should be possible to setup a working toolchain based on GCC-4.9 which we use for Linux and RTEMS. In the past I've used a GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
If Francois agrees it is probably a good idea to let him take over the SPARC as he has put work into both BSP and architecture. Although I would like to acknowledge my interest in u-boot and I hope and believe that my efforts will be resumed in the future. Francois, if you feel it is too much a temporary replacement could also be an option if the u-boot project allows it.
Yes, I am willing to take over as maintainer until such time that Daniel is ready to resume his effort in future. We are investing in the LEON as archtecture and would like to see U-Boot support for SPARC continuing into the future.
Daniel, I would just like to ask if you could stay on as an advisor, if at all possible. I have only access to one LEON3FT board at the moment and may require advice on other devices as time goes by. I will try to keep questions consise and as infrequent as possible for you.
Will rebase my patch set to the latest release this week and resend them for review. Masahiro, what version of GCC is prefered (if any) for the next release of U-Boot. I am currently using the GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
I am not familiar with SPARC architecture at all, but I use kernel.org one for build test.
https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.9.0/
x86_64-gcc-4.9.0-nolibc_sparc-linux.tar.xz
Please note, I have not tested it on any real sparc boards.
On 10/19/2015 04:54 PM, Francois Retief wrote:
Hallo Daniel,
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Hellstrom [mailto:daniel@gaisler.com] Sent: 18 October 2015 11:30 PM To: Masahiro Yamadayamada.masahiro@socionext.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?
On 10/18/2015 05:20 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
(+CC Francois)
2015-10-18 21:24 GMT+09:00 Tom Rinitrini@konsulko.com:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 06:19:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
It looks like sparc has no maintainer and has not been converted to generic board. Should we remove it?
Well, not quite "no maintainer", but... Daniel? SPARC is in need of some work (and possibly a new toolchain too, I stopped building it all the time due to a false positive warning the 3.4.4 toolchain I have gives). Thanks!
-- Tom
I see generic board work for SPARC
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404616/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404618/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404617/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404619/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404620/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404622/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404621/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404624/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404623/
but, Daniel was not responding...
Perhaps, replace the maintainer if Francois agrees?
I regret to say that I've been too busy last two years and I don't see a change during 2015 either.
I would not like to see the SPARC port removed now that the LEON community grows as new LEON3 and LEON4 chips comes to market. WIth multi-core and higher frequency there is a growing interest in u-boot from the LEON community.
Nowadays there are LEON GCC targets mcpu=leon,leon3,leon3v7 so it should be possible to setup a working toolchain based on GCC-4.9 which we use for Linux and RTEMS. In the past I've used a GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
If Francois agrees it is probably a good idea to let him take over the SPARC as he has put work into both BSP and architecture. Although I would like to acknowledge my interest in u-boot and I hope and believe that my efforts will be resumed in the future. Francois, if you feel it is too much a temporary replacement could also be an option if the u-boot project allows it.
Yes, I am willing to take over as maintainer until such time that Daniel is ready to resume his effort in future. We are investing in the LEON as archtecture and would like to see U-Boot support for SPARC continuing into the future.
Thanks!
Daniel, I would just like to ask if you could stay on as an advisor, if at all possible. I have only access to one LEON3FT board at the moment and may require advice on other devices as time goes by. I will try to keep questions consise and as infrequent as possible for you.
I'm on parental leave until January, but I'll do my best.
Regards, Daniel
Will rebase my patch set to the latest release this week and resend them for review. Masahiro, what version of GCC is prefered (if any) for the next release of U-Boot. I am currently using the GCC-4.4 toolchain from Cobham Gaisler.
Regards, Francois
Disclaimer and confidentiality note – refer to our website for further details: www.spaceteq.co.zahttp://www.spaceteq.co.za/home/emaildisclaimer/
participants (6)
-
Daniel Hellstrom -
Francois Retief -
Masahiro Yamada -
Simon Glass -
Tom Rini -
Wolfgang Denk