Thank you for the quick reply.

It doesn't use the functions in fs/jffs2/jffs2_nand_1pass.c if I don't change the makefile though. (The file doesn't even get compiled in.) Or do you mean that we don' t use the file at all?

On 8/11/06, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:

In message e0590900608110650h45af9046yee2b41aa17665379@mail.gmail.com you wrote:

...

If I were to use the new nand flash support implementation and also wanted to add jffs2 support, I use fs/jffs2/jffs2_nand_1pass.c, and not fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c by modifying the makefile in the directory, is that correct?

No Makefile modifications are needed.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de And now remains That we find out the cause of this effect, Or rather say, the cause of this defect... -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene 2

Yes I did. Still, if I don't modify the makefile (i.e. just use jffs2_1pass.c) then the fsinfo or ls on the nand flash fails. If I use the jffs2_nand_1pass.c, everything goes smoothly. FYI, I have two flashes, nor and nand, and uboot is on nor, and nand is the one uses jffs2 fs.

So, what did I miss on readmes?

On 8/11/06, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:

In message e0590900608110724ufc4013p85d01156abc13389@mail.gmail.com you wrote:

...

It doesn't use the functions in fs/jffs2/jffs2_nand_1pass.c if I don't change the makefile though. (The file doesn't even get compiled in.) Or do you mean that we don' t use the file at all?

Did you read doc/README.nand and doc/README.JFFS2_NAND ?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de If you believe that feeling bad or worrying long enough will change a past or future event, then you are residing on another planet with a different reality system.