[U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "nand: make 1-bit software ECC configurable"

This reverts commit 4fee6c2f295f932b8febdc7ce8731ba045695fa5.
It breaks boards that currently rely on soft-ecc, as pointed out here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/140872/
The reverted patch should be resubmitted with documentation, and with the CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT selected from every board that needs it. We could start by looking at what NAND driver the board selects, and whether that driver ever asks for soft ECC.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com --- drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 4 ---- include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h | 25 ------------------------- 3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile index 998fc73..1d1b628 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ COBJS-y += nand_bbt.o COBJS-y += nand_ids.o COBJS-y += nand_util.o endif -COBJS-$(CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT) += nand_ecc.o +COBJS-y += nand_ecc.o COBJS-y += nand_base.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH) += nand_bch.o
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 12b960f..8ab8303 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -3028,10 +3028,6 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd) chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
case NAND_ECC_SOFT: - if (!mtd_nand_has_ecc_soft()) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT not enabled\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } chip->ecc.calculate = nand_calculate_ecc; chip->ecc.correct = nand_correct_data; chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_swecc; diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h index 9715a53..090da50 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h @@ -15,10 +15,6 @@
struct mtd_info;
-#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT) - -static inline int mtd_nand_has_ecc_soft(void) { return 1; } - /* * Calculate 3 byte ECC code for 256 byte block */ @@ -29,25 +25,4 @@ int nand_calculate_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc_code */ int nand_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *dat, u_char *read_ecc, u_char *calc_ecc);
-#else - -static inline int mtd_nand_has_ecc_soft(void) { return 0; } - -static inline int -nand_calculate_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc_code) -{ - return -1; -} - -static inline int -nand_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, - u_char *dat, - u_char *read_ecc, - u_char *calc_ecc) -{ - return -1; -} - -#endif - #endif /* __MTD_NAND_ECC_H__ */

Hello Tom,
will you take this patch? Or should we add the CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT to the boards?
Regards, Thomas
On 02/13/2012 10:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
This reverts commit 4fee6c2f295f932b8febdc7ce8731ba045695fa5.
It breaks boards that currently rely on soft-ecc, as pointed out here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/140872/
The reverted patch should be resubmitted with documentation, and with the CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT selected from every board that needs it. We could start by looking at what NAND driver the board selects, and whether that driver ever asks for soft ECC.
Signed-off-by: Scott Woodscottwood@freescale.com
drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 4 ---- include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h | 25 ------------------------- 3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile index 998fc73..1d1b628 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ COBJS-y += nand_bbt.o COBJS-y += nand_ids.o COBJS-y += nand_util.o endif -COBJS-$(CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT) += nand_ecc.o +COBJS-y += nand_ecc.o COBJS-y += nand_base.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH) += nand_bch.o
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 12b960f..8ab8303 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -3028,10 +3028,6 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd) chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
case NAND_ECC_SOFT:
if (!mtd_nand_has_ecc_soft()) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT not enabled\n");
return -EINVAL;
chip->ecc.calculate = nand_calculate_ecc; chip->ecc.correct = nand_correct_data; chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_swecc;}
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h index 9715a53..090da50 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h @@ -15,10 +15,6 @@
struct mtd_info;
-#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT)
-static inline int mtd_nand_has_ecc_soft(void) { return 1; }
- /*
*/
- Calculate 3 byte ECC code for 256 byte block
@@ -29,25 +25,4 @@ int nand_calculate_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc_code */ int nand_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *dat, u_char *read_ecc, u_char *calc_ecc);
-#else
-static inline int mtd_nand_has_ecc_soft(void) { return 0; }
-static inline int -nand_calculate_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc_code) -{
- return -1;
-}
-static inline int -nand_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd,
u_char *dat,
u_char *read_ecc,
u_char *calc_ecc)
-{
- return -1;
-}
-#endif
- #endif /* __MTD_NAND_ECC_H__ */

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Thomas Weber thomas.weber.linux@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello Tom,
will you take this patch? Or should we add the CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT to the boards?
This just hit mainline via Scott's tree.

Thank you, gentlemen, the patch worked a treat... ................................ U-Boot 2011.12-00374-g54e9668-dirty (Mar 03 2012 - 11:08:23) Pogoplug E02
SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0 DRAM: 256 MiB WARNING: Caches not enabled NAND: 128 MiB ```````````````````````````````
Dave
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Thomas Weber thomas.weber.linux@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello Tom,
will you take this patch? Or should we add the CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT to the boards?
This just hit mainline via Scott's tree.
-- Tom
participants (4)
-
David Purdy
-
Scott Wood
-
Thomas Weber
-
Tom Rini