[PATCH v2 0/2] board: sifive: unmatched: use zero copy for initrd

Booting Ubuntu Impish showed the following output:
relocaddr = 0x00000000fff60000
Loading Ramdisk to fa118000, end fffff19d ...
The initrd is overwriting the U-Boot binary. Booting fails.
There is no need to copy the initrd from $ramdisk_addr_r. Set init_high = ~0UL to use zero copy. Do the same for the device tree.
Rearrange all load addresses:
* put the small files below $kernel_addr_r to not limit the kernel size. * ramdisk_addr_r should be the highest of all loading addresses to avoid limiting the size of the initial RAM disk.
v2: rearrange all more addresses
Heinrich Schuchardt (2): board: sifive: unmatched: use zero copy for initrd board: sifive: unmatched: rearrange load addresses
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Booting Ubuntu Impish showed the following output:
relocaddr = 0x00000000fff60000
Loading Ramdisk to fa118000, end fffff19d ...
The initrd is overwriting the U-Boot binary. Booting fails.
There is no need to copy the initrd from $ramdisk_addr_r. Set init_high = ~0UL to use zero copy. Do the same for the device tree.
Same for the devicetree.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com --- v2: Don't copy fdt either. --- include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index f68d7d7676..69a4eb2f2a 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ "name=system,size=-,bootable,type=${type_guid_gpt_system};"
#define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \ + "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ + "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \ "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \ "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:46:00PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Booting Ubuntu Impish showed the following output:
relocaddr = 0x00000000fff60000 Loading Ramdisk to fa118000, end fffff19d ...
The initrd is overwriting the U-Boot binary. Booting fails.
There is no need to copy the initrd from $ramdisk_addr_r. Set init_high = ~0UL to use zero copy. Do the same for the device tree.
Same for the devicetree.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
v2: Don't copy fdt either.
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index f68d7d7676..69a4eb2f2a 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ "name=system,size=-,bootable,type=${type_guid_gpt_system};"
#define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \
- "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \
- "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \ "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \ "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \
I know I'm doing this out of order, but I'm going to repeat myself here too. You cannot disable device tree relocation. I cannot count the number of hours that have been wasted because of this mis-feature due to misalignment of the device tree or overwriting of the device tree and then U-Boot not fixing it because it was told not to, and then people and projects wasting countless hours over it. It's why checkpatch.pl throws out an ERROR on this now. I didn't yell even more loudly previously at riscv because as it was missing the arch_lmb portion to avoid overwriting U-Boot at run-time, it still was a problem. But that's been fixed. So, no. NAK.

On 11/9/21 16:46, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:46:00PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Booting Ubuntu Impish showed the following output:
relocaddr = 0x00000000fff60000 Loading Ramdisk to fa118000, end fffff19d ...
The initrd is overwriting the U-Boot binary. Booting fails.
There is no need to copy the initrd from $ramdisk_addr_r. Set init_high = ~0UL to use zero copy. Do the same for the device tree.
Same for the devicetree.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
v2: Don't copy fdt either.
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index f68d7d7676..69a4eb2f2a 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ "name=system,size=-,bootable,type=${type_guid_gpt_system};"
#define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \
- "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \
- "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \ "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \ "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \
I know I'm doing this out of order, but I'm going to repeat myself here too. You cannot disable device tree relocation. I cannot count the number of hours that have been wasted because of this mis-feature due to misalignment of the device tree or overwriting of the device tree and then U-Boot not fixing it because it was told not to, and then people and projects wasting countless hours over it. It's why checkpatch.pl throws out an ERROR on this now. I didn't yell even more loudly previously at riscv because as it was missing the arch_lmb portion to avoid overwriting U-Boot at run-time, it still was a problem. But that's been fixed. So, no. NAK.
Why should the devicetree relocated? This should never have been enabled on RISC-V.
Best regards
Heinrich

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:50:27PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/9/21 16:46, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:46:00PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Booting Ubuntu Impish showed the following output:
relocaddr = 0x00000000fff60000 Loading Ramdisk to fa118000, end fffff19d ...
The initrd is overwriting the U-Boot binary. Booting fails.
There is no need to copy the initrd from $ramdisk_addr_r. Set init_high = ~0UL to use zero copy. Do the same for the device tree.
Same for the devicetree.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
v2: Don't copy fdt either.
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index f68d7d7676..69a4eb2f2a 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ "name=system,size=-,bootable,type=${type_guid_gpt_system};" #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \
- "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \
- "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \ "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \ "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \
I know I'm doing this out of order, but I'm going to repeat myself here too. You cannot disable device tree relocation. I cannot count the number of hours that have been wasted because of this mis-feature due to misalignment of the device tree or overwriting of the device tree and then U-Boot not fixing it because it was told not to, and then people and projects wasting countless hours over it. It's why checkpatch.pl throws out an ERROR on this now. I didn't yell even more loudly previously at riscv because as it was missing the arch_lmb portion to avoid overwriting U-Boot at run-time, it still was a problem. But that's been fixed. So, no. NAK.
Why should the devicetree relocated? This should never have been enabled on RISC-V.
To repeat myself, because RISC-V has been broken until very recently and lacked the parts of lmb to avoid overwriting U-Boot while running, is why any platforms have been allowed in with fdt/initrd_high set to disable relocation. As that problem has now been fixed, fdt relocation must be re-enabled on the currently wrong platforms, and will not be allowed on new platforms.
There are specific deployment cases where the developer can choose to disable relocation because they know that there will never be a way for things to be done in an overlapping manner because the system is locked down. That is very rarely the case for mainline and absolutely not the case for a general purpose board like the unmatched.

On 11/9/21 17:07, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:50:27PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/9/21 16:46, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:46:00PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Booting Ubuntu Impish showed the following output:
relocaddr = 0x00000000fff60000 Loading Ramdisk to fa118000, end fffff19d ...
The initrd is overwriting the U-Boot binary. Booting fails.
There is no need to copy the initrd from $ramdisk_addr_r. Set init_high = ~0UL to use zero copy. Do the same for the device tree.
Same for the devicetree.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
v2: Don't copy fdt either.
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index f68d7d7676..69a4eb2f2a 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ "name=system,size=-,bootable,type=${type_guid_gpt_system};" #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \
- "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \
- "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \ "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \ "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \
I know I'm doing this out of order, but I'm going to repeat myself here too. You cannot disable device tree relocation. I cannot count the number of hours that have been wasted because of this mis-feature due to misalignment of the device tree or overwriting of the device tree and then U-Boot not fixing it because it was told not to, and then people and projects wasting countless hours over it. It's why checkpatch.pl throws out an ERROR on this now. I didn't yell even more loudly previously at riscv because as it was missing the arch_lmb portion to avoid overwriting U-Boot at run-time, it still was a problem. But that's been fixed. So, no. NAK.
Why should the devicetree relocated? This should never have been enabled on RISC-V.
To repeat myself, because RISC-V has been broken until very recently and lacked the parts of lmb to avoid overwriting U-Boot while running, is why any platforms have been allowed in with fdt/initrd_high set to disable relocation. As that problem has now been fixed, fdt relocation must be re-enabled on the currently wrong platforms, and will not be allowed on new platforms.
There are specific deployment cases where the developer can choose to disable relocation because they know that there will never be a way for things to be done in an overlapping manner because the system is locked down. That is very rarely the case for mainline and absolutely not the case for a general purpose board like the unmatched.
__lmb_alloc_base() seems not be integrated with the UEFI sub-system. So UEFI might hand out memory marked as reserved in the LMB sub-system.
I guess this is still a topic to be addressed.
Best regards
Heinrich

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:27:52PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/9/21 17:07, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:50:27PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/9/21 16:46, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:46:00PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Booting Ubuntu Impish showed the following output:
relocaddr = 0x00000000fff60000 Loading Ramdisk to fa118000, end fffff19d ...
The initrd is overwriting the U-Boot binary. Booting fails.
There is no need to copy the initrd from $ramdisk_addr_r. Set init_high = ~0UL to use zero copy. Do the same for the device tree.
Same for the devicetree.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
v2: Don't copy fdt either.
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index f68d7d7676..69a4eb2f2a 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ "name=system,size=-,bootable,type=${type_guid_gpt_system};" #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \
- "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \
- "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \ "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \ "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \
I know I'm doing this out of order, but I'm going to repeat myself here too. You cannot disable device tree relocation. I cannot count the number of hours that have been wasted because of this mis-feature due to misalignment of the device tree or overwriting of the device tree and then U-Boot not fixing it because it was told not to, and then people and projects wasting countless hours over it. It's why checkpatch.pl throws out an ERROR on this now. I didn't yell even more loudly previously at riscv because as it was missing the arch_lmb portion to avoid overwriting U-Boot at run-time, it still was a problem. But that's been fixed. So, no. NAK.
Why should the devicetree relocated? This should never have been enabled on RISC-V.
To repeat myself, because RISC-V has been broken until very recently and lacked the parts of lmb to avoid overwriting U-Boot while running, is why any platforms have been allowed in with fdt/initrd_high set to disable relocation. As that problem has now been fixed, fdt relocation must be re-enabled on the currently wrong platforms, and will not be allowed on new platforms.
There are specific deployment cases where the developer can choose to disable relocation because they know that there will never be a way for things to be done in an overlapping manner because the system is locked down. That is very rarely the case for mainline and absolutely not the case for a general purpose board like the unmatched.
__lmb_alloc_base() seems not be integrated with the UEFI sub-system. So UEFI might hand out memory marked as reserved in the LMB sub-system.
I guess this is still a topic to be addressed.
If UEFI can still end up getting U-Boot overwritten, yes, that needs to be addressed. Only slightly surprised one of the capture-the-flag or similar events hasn't come to us yet with some CVEs related to that, too.

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:11 PM Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:27:52PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/9/21 17:07, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:50:27PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/9/21 16:46, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:46:00PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Booting Ubuntu Impish showed the following output:
relocaddr = 0x00000000fff60000 Loading Ramdisk to fa118000, end fffff19d ...
The initrd is overwriting the U-Boot binary. Booting fails.
There is no need to copy the initrd from $ramdisk_addr_r. Set init_high = ~0UL to use zero copy. Do the same for the device tree.
Same for the devicetree.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
v2: Don't copy fdt either.
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index f68d7d7676..69a4eb2f2a 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ "name=system,size=-,bootable,type=${type_guid_gpt_system};" #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \
"fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \
"initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \ "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \ "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \
I know I'm doing this out of order, but I'm going to repeat myself here too. You cannot disable device tree relocation. I cannot count the number of hours that have been wasted because of this mis-feature due to misalignment of the device tree or overwriting of the device tree and then U-Boot not fixing it because it was told not to, and then people and projects wasting countless hours over it. It's why checkpatch.pl throws out an ERROR on this now. I didn't yell even more loudly previously at riscv because as it was missing the arch_lmb portion to avoid overwriting U-Boot at run-time, it still was a problem. But that's been fixed. So, no. NAK.
Why should the devicetree relocated? This should never have been enabled on RISC-V.
To repeat myself, because RISC-V has been broken until very recently and lacked the parts of lmb to avoid overwriting U-Boot while running, is why any platforms have been allowed in with fdt/initrd_high set to disable relocation. As that problem has now been fixed, fdt relocation must be re-enabled on the currently wrong platforms, and will not be allowed on new platforms.
There are specific deployment cases where the developer can choose to disable relocation because they know that there will never be a way for things to be done in an overlapping manner because the system is locked down. That is very rarely the case for mainline and absolutely not the case for a general purpose board like the unmatched.
__lmb_alloc_base() seems not be integrated with the UEFI sub-system. So UEFI might hand out memory marked as reserved in the LMB sub-system.
Heinrich, do you plan to work on this?
It would be great if we could finally solve this situation with the 2022.01 release.
Right now Unmatched is probably the only board that doesn't turn off the relocation, and thus some people hit the issues.
Looking at the git history, the LMB issue is fixed in v2022.01-rc1 only right now. Minus UEFI part, which is/will be important for distributions.
david
I guess this is still a topic to be addressed.
If UEFI can still end up getting U-Boot overwritten, yes, that needs to be addressed. Only slightly surprised one of the capture-the-flag or similar events hasn't come to us yet with some CVEs related to that, too.
-- Tom

__lmb_alloc_base() seems not be integrated with the UEFI sub-system. So UEFI might hand out memory marked as reserved in the LMB sub-system.
Heinrich, do you plan to work on this?
I am not sure if I will have enough capacity to work on the LMB/UEFI integration. But it is surely an issue to be solved.
Best regards
Heinrich
It would be great if we could finally solve this situation with the 2022.01 release.
Right now Unmatched is probably the only board that doesn't turn off the relocation, and thus some people hit the issues.
Looking at the git history, the LMB issue is fixed in v2022.01-rc1 only right now. Minus UEFI part, which is/will be important for distributions.
david
I guess this is still a topic to be addressed.
If UEFI can still end up getting U-Boot overwritten, yes, that needs to be addressed. Only slightly surprised one of the capture-the-flag or similar events hasn't come to us yet with some CVEs related to that, too.
-- Tom

* Put the small files below $kernel_addr_r to not limit the kernel size. * ramdisk_addr_r should be the highest of all loading addresses to avoid limiting the size of the initial RAM disk.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com --- v2: new patch --- include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index 69a4eb2f2a..7a6f4acf4d 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -61,13 +61,14 @@ #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \ "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ - "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \ - "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \ - "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \ - "pxefile_addr_r=0x88200000\0" \ - "ramdisk_addr_r=0x88300000\0" \ - "kernel_comp_addr_r=0x90000000\0" \ - "kernel_comp_size=0x4000000\0" \ + "fdt_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \ + "scriptaddr=0x84100000\0" \ + "pxefile_addr_r=0x84200000\0" \ + "kernel_addr_r=0x85000000\0" \ + "loadaddr=0x85000000\0" \ + "kernel_comp_addr_r=0x8b000000\0" \ + "kernel_comp_size=0x05000000\0" \ + "ramdisk_addr_r=0x90000000\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_loader1=" TYPE_GUID_LOADER1 "\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_loader2=" TYPE_GUID_LOADER2 "\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_system=" TYPE_GUID_SYSTEM "\0" \

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:46:01PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
- Put the small files below $kernel_addr_r to not limit the kernel size.
- ramdisk_addr_r should be the highest of all loading addresses to avoid limiting the size of the initial RAM disk.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
v2: new patch
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index 69a4eb2f2a..7a6f4acf4d 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -61,13 +61,14 @@ #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \ "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \
- "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \
- "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \
- "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \
- "pxefile_addr_r=0x88200000\0" \
- "ramdisk_addr_r=0x88300000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_addr_r=0x90000000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_size=0x4000000\0" \
- "fdt_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \
- "scriptaddr=0x84100000\0" \
- "pxefile_addr_r=0x84200000\0" \
- "kernel_addr_r=0x85000000\0" \
- "loadaddr=0x85000000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_addr_r=0x8b000000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_size=0x05000000\0" \
- "ramdisk_addr_r=0x90000000\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_loader1=" TYPE_GUID_LOADER1 "\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_loader2=" TYPE_GUID_LOADER2 "\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_system=" TYPE_GUID_SYSTEM "\0" \
NAK. Now that riscv finally has arch_lmb support, we need to stop disabling relocation of the device tree. We should also stop disabling relocation of the initrd, and instead (a) do like you're doing and set sane default locations and then (b) set bootm_low/bootm_size such that we won't possibly be moving things outside of the acceptable to the kernel range for everything.

On 11/9/21 16:43, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:46:01PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
- Put the small files below $kernel_addr_r to not limit the kernel size.
- ramdisk_addr_r should be the highest of all loading addresses to avoid limiting the size of the initial RAM disk.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
v2: new patch
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index 69a4eb2f2a..7a6f4acf4d 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -61,13 +61,14 @@ #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \ "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \
- "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \
- "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \
- "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \
- "pxefile_addr_r=0x88200000\0" \
- "ramdisk_addr_r=0x88300000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_addr_r=0x90000000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_size=0x4000000\0" \
- "fdt_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \
- "scriptaddr=0x84100000\0" \
- "pxefile_addr_r=0x84200000\0" \
- "kernel_addr_r=0x85000000\0" \
- "loadaddr=0x85000000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_addr_r=0x8b000000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_size=0x05000000\0" \
- "ramdisk_addr_r=0x90000000\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_loader1=" TYPE_GUID_LOADER1 "\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_loader2=" TYPE_GUID_LOADER2 "\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_system=" TYPE_GUID_SYSTEM "\0" \
NAK. Now that riscv finally has arch_lmb support, we need to stop disabling relocation of the device tree. We should also stop disabling relocation of the initrd, and instead (a) do like you're doing and set sane default locations and then (b) set bootm_low/bootm_size such that we won't possibly be moving things outside of the acceptable to the kernel range for everything.
Why should we relocate initrd or ftd? This never should have been enabled on RISC-V.
Best regards
Heinrich

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:46:00PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/9/21 16:43, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:46:01PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
- Put the small files below $kernel_addr_r to not limit the kernel size.
- ramdisk_addr_r should be the highest of all loading addresses to avoid limiting the size of the initial RAM disk.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
v2: new patch
include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h index 69a4eb2f2a..7a6f4acf4d 100644 --- a/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h +++ b/include/configs/sifive-unmatched.h @@ -61,13 +61,14 @@ #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \ "fdt_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \ "initrd_high=0xffffffffffffffff\0" \
- "kernel_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \
- "fdt_addr_r=0x88000000\0" \
- "scriptaddr=0x88100000\0" \
- "pxefile_addr_r=0x88200000\0" \
- "ramdisk_addr_r=0x88300000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_addr_r=0x90000000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_size=0x4000000\0" \
- "fdt_addr_r=0x84000000\0" \
- "scriptaddr=0x84100000\0" \
- "pxefile_addr_r=0x84200000\0" \
- "kernel_addr_r=0x85000000\0" \
- "loadaddr=0x85000000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_addr_r=0x8b000000\0" \
- "kernel_comp_size=0x05000000\0" \
- "ramdisk_addr_r=0x90000000\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_loader1=" TYPE_GUID_LOADER1 "\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_loader2=" TYPE_GUID_LOADER2 "\0" \ "type_guid_gpt_system=" TYPE_GUID_SYSTEM "\0" \
NAK. Now that riscv finally has arch_lmb support, we need to stop disabling relocation of the device tree. We should also stop disabling relocation of the initrd, and instead (a) do like you're doing and set sane default locations and then (b) set bootm_low/bootm_size such that we won't possibly be moving things outside of the acceptable to the kernel range for everything.
Why should we relocate initrd or ftd?
You MUST relocate the device tree for all of the times it will be loaded in at an incorrectly aligned address. Further, for all of the times it may well end up being overwritten as it doesn't end up at $fdt_addr_r but somewhere else.
Disabling relocation of the initrd is strongly discouraged as it's still quite possible to end up with "Well, we're overlapping the kernel and initrd, but told to ignore that and just proceed...".
This never should have been enabled on RISC-V.
Yes, RISC-V was missing the lmb code to avoid overwriting U-Boot at run-time until recently.
participants (3)
-
David Abdurachmanov
-
Heinrich Schuchardt
-
Tom Rini