Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Getting ready for -rc1

Dear Andreas,
In message 4EDF3855.5010202@corscience.de you wrote:
These are waiting for merge:
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/117688/ (unbreak avr32 arch)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/120993/ (new mmc framework for avr32, brake some board/mmc combinations)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ (unbreak new mmc framework)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/128931/
This is MMC stuff, so they go through Andy's tree.
Maybe you should put him on Cc: (done now).
Instead of adding broken stuff to fix it later you might want to submit a new version of this stuff that sqashes the patches.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk

Dear Wolfgang,
Am 07.12.2011 11:25, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Andreas,
In message 4EDF3855.5010202@corscience.de you wrote:
These are waiting for merge:
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/117688/ (unbreak avr32 arch)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/120993/ (new mmc framework for avr32, brake some board/mmc combinations)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ (unbreak new mmc framework)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/128931/
This is MMC stuff, so they go through Andy's tree.
Only two of them are MMC related.
Maybe you should put him on Cc: (done now).
Instead of adding broken stuff to fix it later you might want to submit a new version of this stuff that sqashes the patches.
Well, only the "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ (unbreak new mmc framework)" is from me. The 'new mmc framework for avr32' is from Sven Schnelle and yes, we could merge these two together .. sven?
IMHO the most important patch is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/117688/ which unbreaks the whole avr32 architecture.
best regards
Andreas Bießmann

Dear Andreas,
In message 4EDF4521.6060901@gmail.com you wrote:
IMHO the most important patch is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/117688/ which unbreaks the whole avr32 architecture.
Was the AVR32 custodian on Cc: ?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk

Dear Wolfgang,
Am 07.12.2011 13:11, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Andreas,
In message 4EDF4521.6060901@gmail.com you wrote:
IMHO the most important patch is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/117688/ which unbreaks the whole avr32 architecture.
Was the AVR32 custodian on Cc: ?
AFAIK Haavrad Skinnemoen does not work at atmel any longer and I think he has nothing else to do with avr32 ...
Since then Reinhard took over as a 'atmel' custodian and yes, he was in CC.
best regards
Andreas Bießmann

Dear Andreas,
In message 4EDF58C0.8090306@gmail.com you wrote:
Was the AVR32 custodian on Cc: ?
AFAIK Haavrad Skinnemoen does not work at atmel any longer and I think
You are right, I have to update my mail aliases :-(
Since then Reinhard took over as a 'atmel' custodian and yes, he was in CC.
OK.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk

Hi Andreas,
On 12/07/2011 02:51 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
Am 07.12.2011 11:25, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Andreas, In message 4EDF3855.5010202@corscience.de you wrote: These are waiting for merge:
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/117688/ (unbreak avr32 arch)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/120993/ (new mmc framework for avr32, brake some board/mmc combinations)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ (unbreak new mmc framework)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/128931/
This is MMC stuff, so they go through Andy's tree.
Only two of them are MMC related.
Maybe you should put him on Cc: (done now).
Instead of adding broken stuff to fix it later you might want to submit a new version of this stuff that sqashes the patches.
Well, only the "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ (unbreak new mmc framework)" is from me. The 'new mmc framework for avr32' is from Sven Schnelle and yes, we could merge these two together .. sven?
No objections against merging those two patches together. Can you do that for me, as i'm traveling and have no access to all the AVR32 stuff for testing.
Thanks,
Sven.

Dear Sven,
Am 07.12.2011 14:20, schrieb Sven Schnelle:
Hi Andreas,
On 12/07/2011 02:51 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
Am 07.12.2011 11:25, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Andreas, In message 4EDF3855.5010202@corscience.de you wrote: These are waiting for merge:
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/117688/ (unbreak avr32 arch)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/120993/ (new mmc framework for avr32, brake some board/mmc combinations)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ (unbreak new mmc framework)
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/128931/
This is MMC stuff, so they go through Andy's tree.
Only two of them are MMC related.
Maybe you should put him on Cc: (done now).
Instead of adding broken stuff to fix it later you might want to submit a new version of this stuff that sqashes the patches.
Well, only the "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ (unbreak new mmc framework)" is from me. The 'new mmc framework for avr32' is from Sven Schnelle and yes, we could merge these two together .. sven?
No objections against merging those two patches together. Can you do that for me, as i'm traveling and have no access to all the AVR32 stuff for testing.
I can do so, but not before Friday ... Andy should comment on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ before doing the merge cause this patch was an RFC ... will forward the patch to him and ask. IMHO those two patches (120993 and 119780) are not a _must_ have for rc1 (or this release at all), but they where posted before merge window closed (and on my wish list).
best regards
Andreas Bießmann
participants (3)
-
Andreas Bießmann
-
Sven Schnelle
-
Wolfgang Denk