On 11/7/21 9:29 PM, qianfanguijin@qq.com wrote:

From: qianfan Zhao qianfanguijin@163.com

CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer is not aligned, and flash sparse images by fastboot will report "Misaligned operation" if DCACHE is enabled.

Flashing Sparse Image CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [84000028, 84001028] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [84001034, 84002034] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8401104c, 8401304c]

Fix it

Signed-off-by: qianfan Zhao qianfanguijin@163.com

lib/image-sparse.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/image-sparse.c b/lib/image-sparse.c index d80fdbbf58..07aa3dd6ba 100644 --- a/lib/image-sparse.c +++ b/lib/image-sparse.c @@ -49,6 +49,41 @@

static void default_log(const char *ignored, char *response) {}

+static lbaint_t write_sparse_chunk_raw(struct sparse_storage *info,

• 		       lbaint_t blk, lbaint_t blkcnt,
  

• 		       void *data,
  

• 		       char *response)
  

+{

• lbaint_t n, write_blks, blks = 0, aligned_buf_blks = 100;
• uint32_t *aligned_buf = NULL;
• if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_DCACHE_OFF))

• return info->write(info, blk, blkcnt, data);
  

• aligned_buf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, info->blksz * aligned_buf_blks);
• if (!aligned_buf) {

• info->mssg("Malloc failed for: CHUNK_TYPE_RAW", response);
  

• return -ENOMEM;
  

• }
• while (blkcnt > 0) {

• n = min(aligned_buf_blks, blkcnt);
  

• memcpy(aligned_buf, data, n * info->blksz);
  

• /* write_blks might be > n due to NAND bad-blocks */
  

• write_blks = info->write(info, blk + blks, n, aligned_buf);
  

• blks += write_blks;
  

• if (write_blks < n)
  

• 	break;
  

• data += n * info->blksz;
  

• blkcnt -= n;
  

• }
• free(aligned_buf);
• return blks;

+}

• int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, const char *part_name, void *data, char *response) {

@@ -152,7 +187,9 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, return -1; }

• 	blks = info->write(info, blk, blkcnt, data);
  

• 	blks = write_sparse_chunk_raw(info, blk, blkcnt,
  

• 				      data, response);
  

• /* blks might be > blkcnt (eg. NAND bad-blocks) */
  if (blks < blkcnt) {
  	printf("%s: %s" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n",
  

The rest of the patch looks good, but the error check here still need to be updated. It should be something like

if (IS_ERR_VALUE(blks)) { printf("%s: Write failed (error %lld)", __func__, blks); info->mssg(...); return blks; } else if (blks < blkcnt) { printf("%s: Write failed, block #" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n", .... }

--Sean