Dear Richard,

in message 921D7EFBFE9DA84E9E1FAD1065D0733B06F46B@dlee2k03.ent.ti.com you wrote:

This patch fixes a few bugs which made udelay() not work properly on 925 based systems. A while back when I increased my boards clock speed I ran into quite a few problems which resulted in these fixes.

Thanks, added. Will show up on CVS "soon".

Ummm... please don't add trailing white space.

I think the Innovator should be switched over to use a real udelay code instead of its busy spins. They do not scale at all with clock speed, and do not keep the useful timestamp properly updating.

You are probably right - patches welcome.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk