[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] arm: socfpga: fix SPL booting from fpga OnChip RAM
This patch prevents disabling the FPGA bridges when SPL or U-Boot is executed from FPGA onchip RAM.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com ---
Changes in v4: - use an inline function in misc.h to check for the address range instead of a macro in base_addr_ac5.h
Changes in v3: - use __image_copy_start to check if we are executing from FPGA
Changes in v2: - use less ifdefs and more C code for address checks (but this gives a checkpatch warning because of comparing two upper case constants) - changed comments
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h | 1 + arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c | 10 +++++++++- arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c | 10 +++++++--- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h index bb9e3faa29..2725e9fcc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #ifndef _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_ #define _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_
+#define SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS 0xc0000000 #define SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS 0xfc000000 #define SOCFPGA_DAP_ADDRESS 0xff000000 #define SOCFPGA_EMAC0_ADDRESS 0xff700000 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h index 4fc9570a04..e78a86503e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ static inline void socfpga_fpga_add(void) {}
#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void); +static inline bool socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(void *addr) +{ + if ((addr >= (void *)SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS) && + (addr < (void *)SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS)) + return true; + return false; +} #endif
#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c index 429c3d6cd5..030f43d80a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include <asm/arch/nic301.h> #include <asm/arch/scu.h> #include <asm/pl310.h> +#include <asm/sections.h>
#include <dt-bindings/reset/altr,rst-mgr.h>
@@ -177,6 +178,8 @@ static void socfpga_nic301_slave_ns(void)
void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void) { + u32 remap; + socfpga_nic301_slave_ns();
/* @@ -187,7 +190,12 @@ void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void) setbits_le32(&scu_regs->sacr, 0xfff);
/* Configure the L2 controller to make SDRAM start at 0 */ - writel(0x1, &nic301_regs->remap); /* remap.mpuzero */ + remap = 0x1; /* remap.mpuzero */ + /* Keep fpga bridge enabled when running from FPGA onchip RAM */ + if (socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(__image_copy_start)) + remap |= 0x8; /* remap.hps2fpga */ + writel(remap, &nic301_regs->remap); + writel(0x1, &pl310->pl310_addr_filter_start); }
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c index be318cc0d9..db1c4b722c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c @@ -92,8 +92,11 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
/* Put everything into reset but L4WD0. */ socfpga_per_reset_all(); - /* Put FPGA bridges into reset too. */ - socfpga_bridges_reset(1); + + if (!socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(__image_copy_start)) { + /* Put FPGA bridges into reset (unless booting from FPGA). */ + socfpga_bridges_reset(1); + }
socfpga_per_reset(SOCFPGA_RESET(SDR), 0); socfpga_per_reset(SOCFPGA_RESET(UART0), 0); @@ -163,5 +166,6 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy) hang(); }
- socfpga_bridges_reset(1); + if (!socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(__image_copy_start)) + socfpga_bridges_reset(1); }
On 10/10/2018 06:26 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
This patch prevents disabling the FPGA bridges when SPL or U-Boot is executed from FPGA onchip RAM.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com
Changes in v4:
- use an inline function in misc.h to check for the address range instead of a macro in base_addr_ac5.h
Changes in v3:
- use __image_copy_start to check if we are executing from FPGA
Changes in v2:
- use less ifdefs and more C code for address checks (but this gives a checkpatch warning because of comparing two upper case constants)
- changed comments
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h | 1 + arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c | 10 +++++++++- arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c | 10 +++++++--- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h index bb9e3faa29..2725e9fcc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #ifndef _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_ #define _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_
+#define SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS 0xc0000000 #define SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS 0xfc000000 #define SOCFPGA_DAP_ADDRESS 0xff000000 #define SOCFPGA_EMAC0_ADDRESS 0xff700000 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h index 4fc9570a04..e78a86503e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ static inline void socfpga_fpga_add(void) {}
#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void); +static inline bool socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(void *addr) +{
Is the inline needed ?
btw would it make sense to encode __image_copy_start here and just make it a function like ie.
static bool socfpga_is_booting_from_fpga(void) {} ?
[...]
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 10/10/2018 06:26 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
This patch prevents disabling the FPGA bridges when SPL or U-Boot is executed from FPGA onchip RAM.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com
Changes in v4:
- use an inline function in misc.h to check for the address range instead of a macro in base_addr_ac5.h
Changes in v3:
- use __image_copy_start to check if we are executing from FPGA
Changes in v2:
- use less ifdefs and more C code for address checks (but this gives a checkpatch warning because of comparing two upper case constants)
- changed comments
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h | 1 + arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c | 10 +++++++++- arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c | 10 +++++++--- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h index bb9e3faa29..2725e9fcc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #ifndef _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_ #define _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_
+#define SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS 0xc0000000 #define SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS 0xfc000000 #define SOCFPGA_DAP_ADDRESS 0xff000000 #define SOCFPGA_EMAC0_ADDRESS 0xff700000 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h index 4fc9570a04..e78a86503e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ static inline void socfpga_fpga_add(void) {}
#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void); +static inline bool socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(void *addr) +{
Is the inline needed ?
If it's in this header, yes. As without the inline, you get this compiler warnings in files that include misc.h but don't call the function: warning: ‘socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
btw would it make sense to encode __image_copy_start here and just make it a function like ie.
static bool socfpga_is_booting_from_fpga(void) {} ?
Sure. Do you want me to move it into misc_gen5.c r keep the inline?
Simon
On 10/10/2018 12:32 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 10/10/2018 06:26 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
This patch prevents disabling the FPGA bridges when SPL or U-Boot is executed from FPGA onchip RAM.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com
Changes in v4:
- use an inline function in misc.h to check for the address range instead of a macro in base_addr_ac5.h
Changes in v3:
- use __image_copy_start to check if we are executing from FPGA
Changes in v2:
- use less ifdefs and more C code for address checks (but this gives a checkpatch warning because of comparing two upper case constants)
- changed comments
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h | 1 + arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c | 10 +++++++++- arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c | 10 +++++++--- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h index bb9e3faa29..2725e9fcc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #ifndef _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_ #define _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_
+#define SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS 0xc0000000 #define SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS 0xfc000000 #define SOCFPGA_DAP_ADDRESS 0xff000000 #define SOCFPGA_EMAC0_ADDRESS 0xff700000 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h index 4fc9570a04..e78a86503e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ static inline void socfpga_fpga_add(void) {}
#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void); +static inline bool socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(void *addr) +{
Is the inline needed ?
If it's in this header, yes. As without the inline, you get this compiler warnings in files that include misc.h but don't call the function: warning: ‘socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Ah, got it.
btw would it make sense to encode __image_copy_start here and just make it a function like ie.
static bool socfpga_is_booting_from_fpga(void) {} ?
Sure. Do you want me to move it into misc_gen5.c r keep the inline?
Nope, just this. Sorry for pestering you so much.
On 10/10/2018 12:49 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 10/10/2018 12:32 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 10/10/2018 06:26 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
This patch prevents disabling the FPGA bridges when SPL or U-Boot is executed from FPGA onchip RAM.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com
Changes in v4:
- use an inline function in misc.h to check for the address range instead of a macro in base_addr_ac5.h
Changes in v3:
- use __image_copy_start to check if we are executing from FPGA
Changes in v2:
- use less ifdefs and more C code for address checks (but this gives a checkpatch warning because of comparing two upper case constants)
- changed comments
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h | 1 + arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c | 10 +++++++++- arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c | 10 +++++++--- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h index bb9e3faa29..2725e9fcc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #ifndef _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_ #define _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_
+#define SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS 0xc0000000 #define SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS 0xfc000000 #define SOCFPGA_DAP_ADDRESS 0xff000000 #define SOCFPGA_EMAC0_ADDRESS 0xff700000 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h index 4fc9570a04..e78a86503e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ static inline void socfpga_fpga_add(void) {}
#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void); +static inline bool socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(void *addr) +{
Is the inline needed ?
If it's in this header, yes. As without the inline, you get this compiler warnings in files that include misc.h but don't call the function: warning: ‘socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Ah, got it.
btw would it make sense to encode __image_copy_start here and just make it a function like ie.
static bool socfpga_is_booting_from_fpga(void) {} ?
Sure. Do you want me to move it into misc_gen5.c r keep the inline?
Nope, just this. Sorry for pestering you so much.
And by just this I mean, just encode the __image_start_addr into the function and drop the argument, keep it where it is.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:50 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 10/10/2018 12:49 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 10/10/2018 12:32 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 10/10/2018 06:26 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
This patch prevents disabling the FPGA bridges when SPL or U-Boot is executed from FPGA onchip RAM.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com
Changes in v4:
- use an inline function in misc.h to check for the address range instead of a macro in base_addr_ac5.h
Changes in v3:
- use __image_copy_start to check if we are executing from FPGA
Changes in v2:
- use less ifdefs and more C code for address checks (but this gives a checkpatch warning because of comparing two upper case constants)
- changed comments
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h | 1 + arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c | 10 +++++++++- arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c | 10 +++++++--- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h index bb9e3faa29..2725e9fcc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #ifndef _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_ #define _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_
+#define SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS 0xc0000000 #define SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS 0xfc000000 #define SOCFPGA_DAP_ADDRESS 0xff000000 #define SOCFPGA_EMAC0_ADDRESS 0xff700000 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h index 4fc9570a04..e78a86503e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ static inline void socfpga_fpga_add(void) {}
#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void); +static inline bool socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(void *addr) +{
Is the inline needed ?
If it's in this header, yes. As without the inline, you get this compiler warnings in files that include misc.h but don't call the function: warning: ‘socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Ah, got it.
btw would it make sense to encode __image_copy_start here and just make it a function like ie.
static bool socfpga_is_booting_from_fpga(void) {} ?
Sure. Do you want me to move it into misc_gen5.c r keep the inline?
Nope, just this. Sorry for pestering you so much.
No problem. Thanks to patman, sending new versions is not really much work :-)
And by just this I mean, just encode the __image_start_addr into the function and drop the argument, keep it where it is.
Yeah, got it.
Simon
participants (2)
-
Marek Vasut -
Simon Goldschmidt