On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:

Mike Frysinger wrote:

...

i'm not about to go through the u-boot/linux/uClibc/whatever tree to satisfy a random licensing tool.  it'd make a lot more sense to fix your tool.

I'm not asking you to go through existing code and make changes.  You're posting a patch for a new file.  Why can't this particular new file use the convention that most of U-Boot uses?

i'm not going to change my coding style to suite some random tool when it makes a lot more sense to fix the tool. i constantly merge code using this style and will continue to do so in the future. -mike