[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] exynos: Properly initialize host_caps in s5p_sdhci_core_init()

The sdhci_host struct is allocated in s5p_sdhci_init() but the fields are not initialized.
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majewski@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de --- drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index 4db51d6..e9c43a9 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static int s5p_sdhci_core_init(struct sdhci_host *host) host->set_control_reg = &s5p_sdhci_set_control_reg; host->set_clock = set_mmc_clk;
+ host->host_caps = 0; if (host->bus_width == 8) host->host_caps |= MMC_MODE_8BIT;

exynos_mmc_init() always returns zero, so for the caller it looks like it never fails.
Correct this by returning the error code of process_nodes(). For process_nodes() do something similar and return early when do_sdhci_init() fails.
v2: Only fail in process_nodes() if we fail on all available nodes.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de --- drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index e9c43a9..b461fde 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int node_list[], int count) { struct sdhci_host *host; int i, node; + int failed = 0;
debug("%s: count = %d\n", __func__, count);
@@ -185,11 +186,18 @@ static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int node_list[], int count)
if (sdhci_get_config(blob, node, host)) { printf("%s: failed to decode dev %d\n", __func__, i); - return -1; + failed++; + continue; + } + + if (do_sdhci_init(host)) { + printf("%s: failed to initialize dev %d\n", __func__, i); + failed++; } - do_sdhci_init(host); } - return 0; + + /* we only consider it an error when all nodes fail */ + return (failed == count ? -1 : 0); }
int exynos_mmc_init(const void *blob) @@ -201,8 +209,6 @@ int exynos_mmc_init(const void *blob) COMPAT_SAMSUNG_EXYNOS_MMC, node_list, SDHCI_MAX_HOSTS);
- process_nodes(blob, node_list, count); - - return 0; + return process_nodes(blob, node_list, count); } #endif

Hello Tobias,
On 09/25/2015 07:18 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
exynos_mmc_init() always returns zero, so for the caller it looks like it never fails.
Correct this by returning the error code of process_nodes(). For process_nodes() do something similar and return early when do_sdhci_init() fails.
v2: Only fail in process_nodes() if we fail on all available nodes.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de
drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index e9c43a9..b461fde 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int node_list[], int count) { struct sdhci_host *host; int i, node;
int failed = 0;
debug("%s: count = %d\n", __func__, count);
@@ -185,11 +186,18 @@ static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int node_list[], int count)
if (sdhci_get_config(blob, node, host)) { printf("%s: failed to decode dev %d\n", __func__, i);
return -1;
failed++;
continue;
}
if (do_sdhci_init(host)) {
printf("%s: failed to initialize dev %d\n", __func__, i);
}failed++;
}do_sdhci_init(host);
- return 0;
/* we only consider it an error when all nodes fail */
return (failed == count ? -1 : 0); }
int exynos_mmc_init(const void *blob)
@@ -201,8 +209,6 @@ int exynos_mmc_init(const void *blob) COMPAT_SAMSUNG_EXYNOS_MMC, node_list, SDHCI_MAX_HOSTS);
- process_nodes(blob, node_list, count);
- return 0;
- return process_nodes(blob, node_list, count); } #endif
Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak p.marczak@samsung.com
Best regards,

In case sdhci_get_config() or do_sdhci_init() fail, show the error code that was returned.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de --- drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index b461fde..b60bc23 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int sdhci_get_config(const void *blob, int node, struct sdhci_host *host) static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int node_list[], int count) { struct sdhci_host *host; - int i, node; + int i, node, ret; int failed = 0;
debug("%s: count = %d\n", __func__, count); @@ -184,14 +184,16 @@ static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int node_list[], int count)
host = &sdhci_host[i];
- if (sdhci_get_config(blob, node, host)) { - printf("%s: failed to decode dev %d\n", __func__, i); + ret = sdhci_get_config(blob, node, host); + if (ret) { + printf("%s: failed to decode dev %d (%d)\n", __func__, i, ret); failed++; continue; }
- if (do_sdhci_init(host)) { - printf("%s: failed to initialize dev %d\n", __func__, i); + ret = do_sdhci_init(host); + if (ret) { + printf("%s: failed to initialize dev %d (%d)\n", __func__, i, ret); failed++; } }

Hello Tobias,
On 09/25/2015 07:18 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
In case sdhci_get_config() or do_sdhci_init() fail, show the error code that was returned.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de
drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index b461fde..b60bc23 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int sdhci_get_config(const void *blob, int node, struct sdhci_host *host) static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int node_list[], int count) { struct sdhci_host *host;
- int i, node;
int i, node, ret; int failed = 0;
debug("%s: count = %d\n", __func__, count);
@@ -184,14 +184,16 @@ static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int node_list[], int count)
host = &sdhci_host[i];
if (sdhci_get_config(blob, node, host)) {
printf("%s: failed to decode dev %d\n", __func__, i);
ret = sdhci_get_config(blob, node, host);
if (ret) {
}printf("%s: failed to decode dev %d (%d)\n", __func__, i, ret); failed++; continue;
if (do_sdhci_init(host)) {
printf("%s: failed to initialize dev %d\n", __func__, i);
ret = do_sdhci_init(host);
if (ret) {
} }printf("%s: failed to initialize dev %d (%d)\n", __func__, i, ret); failed++;
Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak p.marczak@samsung.com
Best regards,

Add more debug printfs in do_sdhci_init() for calls that can potentially fail.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de --- drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index b60bc23..f88d76b 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -102,29 +102,31 @@ struct sdhci_host sdhci_host[SDHCI_MAX_HOSTS];
static int do_sdhci_init(struct sdhci_host *host) { - int dev_id, flag; - int err = 0; + int dev_id, flag, ret;
flag = host->bus_width == 8 ? PINMUX_FLAG_8BIT_MODE : PINMUX_FLAG_NONE; dev_id = host->index + PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0;
if (dm_gpio_is_valid(&host->pwr_gpio)) { dm_gpio_set_value(&host->pwr_gpio, 1); - err = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag); - if (err) { + ret = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag); + if (ret) { debug("MMC not configured\n"); - return err; + return ret; } }
if (dm_gpio_is_valid(&host->cd_gpio)) { - if (dm_gpio_get_value(&host->cd_gpio)) + ret = dm_gpio_get_value(&host->cd_gpio); + if (ret) { + debug("no SD card detected (%d)\n", ret); return -ENODEV; + }
- err = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag); - if (err) { + ret = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag); + if (ret) { printf("external SD not configured\n"); - return err; + return ret; } }

Hello,
On 09/25/2015 07:18 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
Add more debug printfs in do_sdhci_init() for calls that can potentially fail.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de
drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index b60bc23..f88d76b 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -102,29 +102,31 @@ struct sdhci_host sdhci_host[SDHCI_MAX_HOSTS];
static int do_sdhci_init(struct sdhci_host *host) {
- int dev_id, flag;
- int err = 0;
int dev_id, flag, ret;
flag = host->bus_width == 8 ? PINMUX_FLAG_8BIT_MODE : PINMUX_FLAG_NONE; dev_id = host->index + PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0;
if (dm_gpio_is_valid(&host->pwr_gpio)) { dm_gpio_set_value(&host->pwr_gpio, 1);
err = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag);
if (err) {
ret = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag);
if (ret) { debug("MMC not configured\n");
return err;
return ret;
} }
if (dm_gpio_is_valid(&host->cd_gpio)) {
if (dm_gpio_get_value(&host->cd_gpio))
ret = dm_gpio_get_value(&host->cd_gpio);
if (ret) {
debug("no SD card detected (%d)\n", ret); return -ENODEV;
}
err = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag);
if (err) {
ret = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag);
if (ret) { printf("external SD not configured\n");
return err;
} }return ret;
Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak p.marczak@samsung.com
Best regards,

Hello Tobias,
On 09/25/2015 07:18 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
The sdhci_host struct is allocated in s5p_sdhci_init() but the fields are not initialized.
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majewski@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de
drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index 4db51d6..e9c43a9 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static int s5p_sdhci_core_init(struct sdhci_host *host) host->set_control_reg = &s5p_sdhci_set_control_reg; host->set_clock = set_mmc_clk;
- host->host_caps = 0; if (host->bus_width == 8) host->host_caps |= MMC_MODE_8BIT;
Good point, but we usually initialize only required fields of structures.
What about use of calloc() instead of malloc() for this structure allocation, in s5p_sdhci_init() function?
Some time ago, the the memory reserved for malloc was initialized with zeroes at early init, so potentially "bugs" like this one, were hidden very well.
Best regards,
participants (2)
-
Przemyslaw Marczak
-
Tobias Jakobi