Hello Jagan,
I sent the new revision of the protective SPI NOR patches; is it possible for you to review them? I would like to get them applied for 2015.10 as they are blocking the Congatec patches.
On 21 September 2015 at 23:43, Otavio Salvador otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br wrote:
Hello Jagan,
I sent the new revision of the protective SPI NOR patches; is it possible for you to review them? I would like to get them applied for 2015.10 as they are blocking the Congatec patches.
Out of all protection bit changes were very crucial, I will take some time to revert back. Will protection bit changes brocks your congatec patches?
thanks!
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Jagan Teki jteki@openedev.com wrote:
On 21 September 2015 at 23:43, Otavio Salvador otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br wrote:
Hello Jagan,
I sent the new revision of the protective SPI NOR patches; is it possible for you to review them? I would like to get them applied for 2015.10 as they are blocking the Congatec patches.
Out of all protection bit changes were very crucial, I will take some time to revert back. Will protection bit changes brocks your congatec patches?
We need to protect the SPI NOR area or customer may erase the manufacture data by mistake. We need the SPI NOR as well to read the part-# and properly configure the SPL memory data so they are critical for us.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517089/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517090/
I think if you ack the patches, they could go through the i.MX tree so it goes in a single pull request.
Stefano?
On 22 September 2015 at 00:06, Otavio Salvador otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Jagan Teki jteki@openedev.com wrote:
On 21 September 2015 at 23:43, Otavio Salvador otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br wrote:
Hello Jagan,
I sent the new revision of the protective SPI NOR patches; is it possible for you to review them? I would like to get them applied for 2015.10 as they are blocking the Congatec patches.
Out of all protection bit changes were very crucial, I will take some time to revert back. Will protection bit changes brocks your congatec patches?
We need to protect the SPI NOR area or customer may erase the manufacture data by mistake. We need the SPI NOR as well to read the part-# and properly configure the SPL memory data so they are critical for us.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517089/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517090/
I think if you ack the patches, they could go through the i.MX tree so it goes in a single pull request.
Let me give sometime will back again.
Stefano?
thanks!
Hi Otavio, Jagan,
On 21/09/2015 20:36, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Jagan Teki jteki@openedev.com wrote:
On 21 September 2015 at 23:43, Otavio Salvador otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br wrote:
Hello Jagan,
I sent the new revision of the protective SPI NOR patches; is it possible for you to review them? I would like to get them applied for 2015.10 as they are blocking the Congatec patches.
Out of all protection bit changes were very crucial, I will take some time to revert back. Will protection bit changes brocks your congatec patches?
We need to protect the SPI NOR area or customer may erase the manufacture data by mistake. We need the SPI NOR as well to read the part-# and properly configure the SPL memory data so they are critical for us.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517089/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517090/
I think if you ack the patches, they could go through the i.MX tree so it goes in a single pull request.
Stefano?
It is fine with me - if SPI patches are ok for Jagan, I can pick them with Congatec's.
Best regards, Stefano
participants (3)
-
Jagan Teki -
Otavio Salvador -
Stefano Babic