[U-Boot] Cosmetic doc typo fixes to the kwbimage feature docs
Hi,
I'm looking into the kirkwood docs and found some typos.
I'm not proficent in git. If there's a problem with my git-age, or anything else, please let me know.
Thanks.
--- board/Marvell/sheevaplug/kwbimage.cfg | 4 ++-- doc/README.kwbimage | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/Marvell/sheevaplug/kwbimage.cfg b/board/Marvell/sheevaplug/kwbimage.cfg index 3b9c53f..55be3a3 100644 --- a/board/Marvell/sheevaplug/kwbimage.cfg +++ b/board/Marvell/sheevaplug/kwbimage.cfg @@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ # Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, # MA 02110-1301 USA # -# Refer docs/README.kwimage for more details about how-to configure -# and create kirkwood boot image +# Refer to doc/README.kwbimage for more details about how-to +# configure and create kirkwood boot images. #
# Boot Media configurations diff --git a/doc/README.kwbimage b/doc/README.kwbimage index 6dd942f..7f15e6d 100644 --- a/doc/README.kwbimage +++ b/doc/README.kwbimage @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ for ex. -T kwbimage -a 0x00600000 -e 0x00600000 \ -d u-boot.bin u-boot.kwb
-kwimage support available with mkimage utility will generate kirkwood boot +kwbimage support available with mkimage utility will generate kirkwood boot image that can be flashed on the board NAND/SPI flash
Board specific configuration file specifications:
On 07/26/2012 11:15:32 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into the kirkwood docs and found some typos.
I'm not proficent in git. If there's a problem with my git-age, or anything else, please let me know.
I used git send-mail to send the above and it sent 2 emails (?), of which this was the first. The actual patch was the second email and it did not show up on this list, perhaps because this was my first post and needed moderation.
Should I send the patch again? (Trivial stuff, but I've another doc fix waiting and wanted to get this right first.)
Thanks.
Karl kop@meme.com Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein
-----Original Message----- From: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot- bounces@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Karl O. Pinc Sent: 27 July 2012 20:23 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Cosmetic doc typo fixes to the kwbimage feature docs
On 07/26/2012 11:15:32 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into the kirkwood docs and found some typos.
I'm not proficent in git. If there's a problem with my git-age, or anything else, please let me know.
I used git send-mail to send the above and it sent 2 emails (?), of which this was the first. The actual patch was the second email and it did not show up on this list, perhaps because this was my first post and needed moderation.
Should I send the patch again? (Trivial stuff, but I've another doc fix waiting and wanted to get this right first.)
You may send your v2 with this fix. Please send it first you your email-id just to validate you are sending right patches (before sending on mailing list).
Regards... Prafulla . . .
On 07/30/2012 01:36:07 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot- bounces@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Karl O. Pinc Sent: 27 July 2012 20:23 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Cosmetic doc typo fixes to the kwbimage
feature
docs
On 07/26/2012 11:15:32 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into the kirkwood docs and found some typos.
I'm not proficent in git. If there's a problem with my git-age, or anything else, please let me know.
I used git send-mail to send the above and it sent 2 emails (?), of which this was the first. The actual patch was the second email and it did not show up on this list, perhaps because this was my first post and needed moderation.
Should I send the patch again? (Trivial stuff, but I've another doc fix waiting and wanted to get this right first.)
You may send your v2 with this fix.
Ok. Sent again. (FYI, the original patch never did make it to the mailing list but is sitting in patchwork.)
Original version of the patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/173553/ (Still sitting there with a "New" status.)
The only difference is that now there's a Signed-Off: line.
FYI: I suspect I didn't thread it. And I've probably put my comments in the wrong place in all 3 of the patches I've sent so far. I think I see how it all works now, where to put the commit line, the longer commit description, and the comments.
(I thought the commit line came out of the subject. Git put my commit line there, but apparently not in the right place in the message body.)
Karl kop@meme.com Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein
participants (2)
-
Karl O. Pinc -
Prafulla Wadaskar