The secure_hdr needs to be 0 init-ed however this was never being put into the secure_buf, leading to possibility of the first 4 bytes of secure_buf being possibly garbage.

Fix this by initialising the secure_hdr itself to the secure_buf location, thus when we make it 0, it automatically ensures the first 4 bytes are 0.

Fixes: 32cd25128bd849 ("firmware: Add basic support for TI System Control Interface (TI SCI)") Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole d-gole@ti.com ---

Boot tested for sanity on AM62x SK https://gist.github.com/DhruvaG2000/724ceba3a0db03f4b0bff47de1160074

Changelog: Rebased on top of latest master branch

Cc: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com Cc: Neha Francis n-francis@ti.com Cc: Manorit Chawdhry m-chawdhry@ti.com, Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra vigneshr@ti.com, Cc: Kamlesh Gurudasani kamlesh@ti.com

drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c index 6e9f93e9a302..f7675e383d47 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c @@ -236,13 +236,13 @@ static int ti_sci_do_xfer(struct ti_sci_info *info, { struct k3_sec_proxy_msg *msg = &xfer->tx_message; u8 secure_buf[info->desc->max_msg_size]; - struct ti_sci_secure_msg_hdr secure_hdr; + struct ti_sci_secure_msg_hdr *secure_hdr = (struct ti_sci_secure_msg_hdr *)secure_buf; int ret;

if (info->is_secure) { /* ToDo: get checksum of the entire message */ - secure_hdr.checksum = 0; - secure_hdr.reserved = 0; + secure_hdr->checksum = 0; + secure_hdr->reserved = 0; memcpy(&secure_buf[sizeof(secure_hdr)], xfer->tx_message.buf, xfer->tx_message.len);

base-commit: 15e7927b5a2d33666af19879577bf0c30ab088fe