-----Original Message----- From: U-Boot u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de On Behalf Of Rick Chen Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 12:51 PM To: Anup Patel anup@brainfault.org Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com; U-Boot Mailing List <u- boot@lists.denx.de>; Greentime Hu green.hu@gmail.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] SiFive FU540 U-Boot patches,
Hi Anup
Anup Patel anup@brainfault.org 於 2019年2月25日 週一 上午11:28寫道 ：
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 7:50 AM Rick Chen rickchen36@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Anup
Rick Chen rickchen36@gmail.com 於 2019年2月22日 週五 下午12:05
寫道：
Hi Anup
Anup Patel anup@brainfault.org 於 2019年2月21日 週四 下午5:57
寫道：
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:48 PM Anup Patel
anup@brainfault.org wrote:
> > Hi Rick, > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:19 AM Rick Chen
rickchen36@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Hi Anup > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > Thanks for all the review comments so far. > > > > > > > > Is it possible to accept "[PATCH v7 00/15] SiFive > > > > FU540 Support" for > > > > U-Boot-2019.04 ?? > > > > > > > > Based on our discussion with various folks at > > > > FOSDEM19, lot of people want to use U-Boot on > > > > Unleashed board. In general, it will be exciting to see U-Boot
being adopted as bootloader by various RISC-V HW vendors.
> > > > I am still waiting for Simon's response about the two > > patchs that he have comments. > > I have addressed Simon's patches and got Reviewed-by as well. > > I have posted "[PATCH v9 00/15] SiFive FU540 Support" which > is based on U-Boot-2019.4-rc2. > > You can also find this patches in riscv_sifive_fu540_v9 > branch of https://github.com/avpatel/u-boot.git
Thanks for the support and hopefully we can get this one plus Lukas's SMP series in the v2019.04 release.
It will be awesome to have Lukas's SMP patches along with SiFive FU540 patches in v2019.04
OK I will pull into u-boot-riscv and run Travis.
Can you take a look this Travis fail item 12.44 as below https://travis-ci.org/rickchen36/u-boot-riscv/jobs/496911491
Ahh, this issue got introduced when I removed "#if" (Suggested by Alex) from clk_fixed_factor_ofdata_to_platdata() in v3 of this patchset.
I suggest we bring back the "#if" by modifying PATCH9 with following additional change:
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_fixed_factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk_fixed_factor.c index 9e00544889..5fa20a84db 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk_fixed_factor.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_fixed_factor.c @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_fixed_factor_ops = {
static int clk_fixed_factor_ofdata_to_platdata(struct udevice *dev) { +#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA) int err; struct clk_fixed_factor *ff = to_clk_fixed_factor(dev);
@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ static int clk_fixed_factor_ofdata_to_platdata(struct udevice *dev)
ff->div = dev_read_u32_default(dev, "clock-div", 1); ff->mult = dev_read_u32_default(dev, "clock-mult", 1);+#endif
return 0;}
The above will resolve Travis build fail.
Will you send another patchset to solve this fail issue ?
Okay, will do it right away.
Regards, Anup