Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 2/3] wdt: Timeout better to be in microseconds

Hi Andy,

On 5 July 2017 at 11:44, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:

Timeout in some abstract ticks is not what we are applying to get deterministic behaviour.

A tick is always milliseconds in U-Boot, as I understand it.

Convert name to show explicitly that we are using microseconds (for watchdog it's more than precise).

Do you want microseconds, or is milliseconds enough accuracy? I have a hard time imagining a case where a microsecond watchdog timeout is useful.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com

drivers/watchdog/wdt-uclass.c | 4 ++-- include/wdt.h | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Regards, Simon