11 Mar
2013
11 Mar
'13
6:28 p.m.
On 03/11/2013 03:56 AM, sonic.adi@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sonic Zhang sonic.zhang@analog.com
- Should return 0 for both DOS_MBR and DOS_PBR block types in test_part_dos().
What problem does this solve?
I don't believe this change is correct. The purpose of test_part_dos() is to determine whether a block device contains an MS-DOS partition table.
Such a partition table is present in an MBR, but not a PBR. A PBR contains a *FAT file-system, and does not include a partition table.