Hi Marek,
On 13 May 2018 at 16:22, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 05/14/2018 12:02 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
On 13 May 2018 at 08:23, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Add support for loading U-Boot and optionally FDT from a fitImage in SPL by using the full fitImage support from U-Boot. While we do have limited SPL loading support in SPL with a small footprint, it is missing a lot of important features, like checking signatures. This support has all the fitImage features, while the footprint is obviously larger.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de Cc: Pantelis Antoniou pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com Cc: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
V2: - Drop blank line below spl_load_fit_image() - Explicitly enable image verification if available
Kconfig | 11 +++++++++ common/spl/spl.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Can you add this to the FIT tests?
Yeah, do you have some pointers for me ?
The current test is in test/py/tests/test_fit.py so you can start with that, or create a new one based on it.
At present we have sandbox_spl which includes SPL support. If you run a test with that (i.e. CONFIG_SPL set) it will run SPL, which in turn will load U-Boot. The logic for that is in u_boot_console_sandbox.py and the function which actually loads U-Boot is spl_board_load_image().
So I think you could create a FIT with U-Boot and a DTB in it, then modify spl_board_load_image() to use that instead. Then your test could simply check the console output. For example test_ofplatdata.py shows how to find a string in the output, although at present that test does nothing, since there is no way to tell SPL to output the platdata.
Regards, Simon