On Isn, 2017-06-05 at 11:32 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
On Sab, 2017-06-03 at 13:27 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 05/29/2017 06:00 AM, tien.fong.chee@intel.com wrote:
From: Tien Fong Chee tien.fong.chee@intel.com
This patch is for enabling the FPGA driver support on SPL.
Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee tien.fong.chee@intel.com
include/configs/socfpga_common.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h index da7e4ad..e74e7eb 100644 --- a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h +++ b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ #define CONFIG_FPGA #define CONFIG_FPGA_ALTERA #define CONFIG_FPGA_SOCFPGA +#define CONFIG_SPL_FPGA_SUPPORT
This should be Kconfig symbol selected in board config. Why is it not Kconfig symbol ?
Ahha....ijust recalled there is a very important reason i did this because CONFIG_CMD_FPGA which is wrapping all these FPGA related CONFIG is not part of kconfig. During the build, kconfig and Macro #define are in two different phase/order, so we might having build issue during kconfig build(1st phase) when some Macro #define which is 2nd phase are required.
I have a patch that is specific for converting all FPGA related Macro config by tool created which will be submited after this patch set. Let me know if you prefer kconfig symbol.
#define CONFIG_FPGA_COUNT 1 #endif #endif