On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 at 07:02:59 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Marek,
Am 18.03.2014 01:21, schrieb Marek Vasut:
On Monday, March 17, 2014 at 11:56:16 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
move the flushing code into an extra function dfu_flush(), so it can be used from other code.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocherhs@denx.de Cc: Lukasz Majewskil.majewski@samsung.com Cc: Kyungmin Parkkyungmin.park@samsung.com Cc: Marek Vasutmarex@denx.de Cc: Pantelis Antonioupanto@antoniou-consulting.com
[...]
@@ -199,23 +221,7 @@ int dfu_write(struct dfu_entity *dfu, void *buf, int size, int blk_seq_num)
/* end? */ if (size == 0) {
/* Now try and flush to the medium if needed. */if (dfu->flush_medium)ret = dfu->flush_medium(dfu);printf("\nDFU complete CRC32: 0x%08x\n", dfu->crc);/* clear everything */dfu_free_buf();dfu->crc = 0;dfu->offset = 0;dfu->i_blk_seq_num = 0;dfu->i_buf_start = dfu_buf;dfu->i_buf_end = dfu_buf;dfu->i_buf = dfu->i_buf_start;dfu->inited = 0;- }
ret = dfu_flush(dfu, buf, size, blk_seq_num);This seems broken, at least because you didn't close the opened brace (see 'if (size == 0) {' .... I can fix this up when applying.
Argh... you are right .... patch 2/3 of this series deletes the complete if ... I can send a new version, but if you want to fix it that would be great!
OK, fixed up.
Do you want this in 2014.04 or in -next ?
Hmm.. 2014.04 would be nice, but I think this is Lukasz decision, because I changed the dfu state machine, and maybe he want to see more tests?
OK, let's see.
Best regards, Marek Vasut