29 Sep
2011
29 Sep
'11
2:44 a.m.
Hi Sonny,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Sonny Rao sonnyrao@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.russ@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sonny,
[snip]
So yes, you are right - In terms of license compliance, we are OK as U-Boot is currently GPLv2 - In terms of U-Boot going to GPLv3, we are digging a bigger hole :)
Ok, then that's up to the U-boot community to decide if they wish to remove all GPLv2 only code, but I think that's a separate issue from what you originally brought up. I think we're in agreement that there aren't any licensing considerations with respect to maintaining the existing license which is GPLv2 only for lib/vsprintf.c.
Agree 100%
Regards,
Graeme