On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 08:12:36PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 6:04 PM Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
Yeah, just hit re-run when that happens, sadly.
Ok, only sunxi failed.
If I try:
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/sunxi/u-boot-spl.lds +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/sunxi/u-boot-spl.lds @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ SECTIONS __image_copy_end = .; _end = .;
_image_binary_end = .;.bss : { . = ALIGN(4);diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl.lds b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl.lds index 306a4ddf3cd2..0787dfff8fb7 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl.lds +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl.lds @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ SECTIONS __image_copy_end = .; _end = .;
_image_binary_end = .;.bss : { . = ALIGN(4);Then it builds fine.
I am thinking of sending the sunxi lds change as part of a series in v2.
So v2 would become:
1/2: the sunxi lds change above
2/2 the original patch:
--- a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c +++ b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static void spl_parse_legacy_validate(uintptr_t start, uintptr_t size) { uintptr_t spl_start = (uintptr_t)_start;
uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)__bss_end;
uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)_image_binary_end; uintptr_t end = start + size;
Sounds good.