Hello Pavel,
Am 18.04.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Pavel Machek:
Hi!
Hi!
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name, but no reg property
I don't know who produces the warnings, but perhaps fix the tool, instead?
This warnigns poping up with new DTC compilers, introduced from dtc commit:
IMO compiler should be fixed.
A simple revert of this commit fixes it ... yes, but, see below.
ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifiesthat any
This is arm. This is not powerpc. It is 2016, not 1997.
Hmm...
usbphy0: usbphy@0 {
usbphy0: usbphy { #phy-cells = <0>; compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv"; status = "okay";And this sounds like a bug waiting to happen..
Better fix would be to add the reg property .. could you help me?
Introduce fake "reg" property to shut up warning?
or fix "usbphy@0" to "usbphy0".
I guess this should be solved on the kernel list, and I believe the warnings are wrong.
I think it is discussed on the kernel mailinglist, see for example:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.devicetree.compiler/432
Nice here the comment from rob: "Any objections to this series will result in getting added as a DT binding maintainer. :)"
So, feel free to speak up!
bye, Heiko