Dear Alexander Stein,
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h index c520e89..75d4324 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ typedef struct at91_spi { at91_pdc_t pdc; } at91_spi_t;
If we touch header and driver anyway, we could get rid of the depreciated typedefs, to get conform to the coding style.
See discussion about that 1-2 days ago :)
+#define AT91_SPI_CR_SPIEN 0x00000001 +#define AT91_SPI_CR_SWRST 0x00000080
+#define AT91_SPI_MR_MSTR 0x00000001 +#define AT91_SPI_MR_MODFDIS 0x00000004 +#define AT91_SPI_MR_PCS 0x000f0000
+#define AT91_SPI_SR_RXBUFF 0x00000040 +#define AT91_SPI_SR_SPIENS 0x00010000
+#define AT91_SPI_CSR_NCPHA 0x00000001 +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_DLYBS 0x00ff0000 +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_DLYBCT 0xff000000
#ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY
After that patch, do we still need LEGACY?
Best Regards, Reinhard