Hello.
On 08-08-2011 17:57, Yao Cheng wrote:
The issue is found when calling flush_cache() with zero "size" argument. The bound of loop is miscalculated in this case and flush_cache() enters a wrong flushing loop. To fix this issue I skipped the operations when "size" is found to be zero.
Signed-off-by: Yao Chengsaturdaycoder@gmail.com Cc: Shinya Kuribayashiskuribay@pobox.com
Changes for v2:
- Coding style cleanup
- Move code after declarations to avoid warning
arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c index 3ae397c..8fa53ba 100644 --- a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c +++ b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ void flush_cache(ulong start_addr, ulong size) unsigned long addr = start_addr& ~(lsize - 1); unsigned long aend = (start_addr + size - 1)& ~(lsize - 1);
- /* aend will be miscalculated when size is zero, so we return here */
- if (size == 0) {
return;- }
{} not needed here.
WBR, Sergei